[OpenFontLibrary] WOFF Ultra Condensed
Chris Lilley
chris at w3.org
Mon Apr 2 09:31:53 PDT 2012
On Thursday, March 29, 2012, 9:46:38 AM, Fontfreedom wrote:
>>In this proposal, we've tried to strike a balance between complexity
>>and aggressiveness of compression. The biggest gains by far come from
>>better compression of the glyf table (and eliminating the loca table
>>altogether), so basically this proposal squeezes this table to the
>>maximum.
Fac> Why is it a good idea to remove the glyph location "loca" table?
It is removed for transfer (partly because the offsets would be incorrect as a result of the compression, but mostly because it can be recomputed), then recreated as the font is decompressed.
--
Chris Lilley Technical Director, Interaction Domain
W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead
Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
More information about the OpenFontLibrary
mailing list