[OpenFontLibrary] WOFF Ultra Condensed

Chris Lilley chris at w3.org
Mon Apr 2 09:31:53 PDT 2012


On Thursday, March 29, 2012, 9:46:38 AM, Fontfreedom wrote:

>>In this proposal, we've tried to strike a balance between  complexity
>>and aggressiveness of compression. The biggest gains by far  come from
>>better compression of the glyf table (and eliminating the loca  table
>>altogether), so basically this proposal squeezes this table to  the
>>maximum.

Fac> Why is it a good idea to remove the glyph location "loca"  table?

It is removed for transfer (partly because the offsets would be incorrect as a result of the compression, but mostly because it can be recomputed), then recreated as the font is decompressed.   



-- 
 Chris Lilley   Technical Director, Interaction Domain                 
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead
 Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
 Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups



More information about the OpenFontLibrary mailing list