[OpenFontLibrary] Adobe's Source Sans Pro

Khaled Hosny khaledhosny at eglug.org
Fri Aug 3 01:32:19 PDT 2012


On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 12:04:47PM +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Khaled Hosny <khaledhosny at eglug.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 11:07:50AM +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Dave Crossland <dave at lab6.com> wrote:
> >> > Haha damn you that would have been my fault if it was messed up! XD
> >>
> >> BTW, it's the first time I noticed this: is Pango really uncapable of
> >> seeing Extra Light weights?
> >>
> >> More than that, it renames weights. E.g. in both Inkscape and GIMP, I
> >> get Heavy instead of Black.
> >
> > That would be FontConfig not Pango.
>
> Hmmm, grepping /etc/fonts doesn't return anything related

I wouldn't expect to find anything useful there (that logic is in the
library itself).

Using fc-query, it reports the same weight value for Light and Extra
light fonts (50). Looking into the fonts OS/2 table, the Extra Light has
weight value of 250 (not sure about the exact relation between FC weight
and OS/2 one) while FontForge's predefined values suggest 200 for Extra
Light, which corresponds to OS/2 table documentation:
http://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/os2.htm#wtc

So I'd say it is a font bug (might be a FontConfig limitation as well, I
have some vague recollection about some discussion somewhere on whether
OS/2 weight must be multiples of 100 or not).

fc-query reports Black weight not Heavy.

(I didn't installed the fonts, just using fc-query on the downloaded
files).

Regards,
 Khaled


More information about the OpenFontLibrary mailing list