[OpenFontLibrary] [GFD] Treatment of the OFL in the wild

[Victor Gaultney]

On 3 Jun 2013, at 20:36, Vernon Adams <vern at newtypography.co.uk> wrote:

> I have now contacted font pro.com about this. They promise to remedy the situation.

Great. This is exactly how the process should work. The community polices itself. If anyone comes across a service that seems to violate the OFL, those who have a vested interest (mainly the font designers) should contact them and suggest how they could fix the situation. We've done that a few times, since we have fonts out there too.

That's a far more sustainable and healthy model than expecting the license maintainers to become the font police. Of course, we're happy to give advice, answer questions about details and best practices, and document the answers in public docs.

V
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/openfontlibrary/attachments/20130604/8b5e635c/attachment.html>