[OpenFontLibrary] [GFD] OFL-FAQ update draft and web fonts paper

[Vernon Adams]

On 23 May 2013, at 09:36, Dave Crossland <dave at lab6.com> wrote:

> On 23 May 2013 02:43, Vernon Adams <vern at newtypography.co.uk> wrote:
>> Not sure i understand 100% what you are saying :)
>> specifically -  "Free software can be charged for; otherwise it is not free as in
>> freedom"
>> is there a 'not' missing?
> 
> No :)
> 
> Free software can be sold. Freedom to redistribute for a fee is one of
> the FSF core 4 freedoms.


Yes i know. I couldn't get my head around the sentence structure (was a late night), plus, the OFL does disallow selling (under specific circumstances). Hence my confusion at what Barry was saying exactly. I see it now.