[OpenFontLibrary] [GFD] OFL-FAQ update draft and web fonts paper

Eric Schrijver eric at authoritism.net
Thu May 23 15:40:46 PDT 2013


On 05/23/2013 07:36 PM, Nathan Willis wrote:
> I'm _generally_ in favor of pursuing the trademark front as an
> alternative to RFN (although obviously at this point it's a bit
> experimental).  I wonder, though, if recommending trademarks would be
> problematic because of the differences in trademark law between
> jurisdictions.
>
> I don't know global TM law; maybe it's so convoluted that ever country
> would require its own FAQ.  But maybe it's not...

Hey girls and guys,

just some practical points:

the RFN works great against a usual argument of type designers who are 
afraid that open sourcing their work will lead to forks of ‘questionable 
quality’—you can say that they have control over ‘their’ version of the 
font because other fonts need a distinguishly different name.

the RFN doesn’t work great in terms of the Git/github model of 
development, because basically in the cycle forking, modifying, 
submitting a pull request, you are already violating the RFN.

At the same time, the fact that there are many versions of one artwork / 
typeface / software with the same name can be difficult. I think for 
instance of the many versions of GitX floating around. That’s where I 
like the RFN as well.

In theory, I would like a soft RFN that forces you to change the name if 
you don’t intend to contribute your changes back to the font you forked. [1]

Trademarks, on the other hand, to me seem pretty ludicrous, but I might 
be misinformed. As far as I know, they cost money, and require active 
litigation to keep them valid (i.e., contrary to copyright, if you don’t 
activily sue for trademark infringements you risk to loose the trademark 
protection).
Can someone outline how asking for a trademark would work for an 
indepent Font designer and how it would benefit them?

Good night!

xx
E

[1] BTW, hard forks, forks that don’t contribute back to the thing 
forked from, seem more desirable in fonts then in software. Like Gill is 
a fork of Johnston, or Helvetica of Akzidensk—that’s cool, and something 
made a lot more easy by an ecosystem of OFL fonts.







More information about the OpenFontLibrary mailing list