[Openicc] [Gimp-print-devel] Drop size calibration
Robert Krawitz
rlk at alum.mit.edu
Sun Jan 27 17:46:07 PST 2008
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 17:37:23 -0800
From: "Roy Harrington" <roy at harrington.com>
As far as I can tell your method is matching the density of a 10%
large dot with say a 20% small dot. But in a real print the
transition from small dot to large dot happens at a much higher
percentage -- say 100% small to 50% large. So while it would seem
that mathematically its the same thing, the non-linearity of dot
gain makes a difference. Small dots have more relative dot gain
than larger dots because the circumference to area ratio is larger.
I suspect this is a least one factor causing your "larger" small
dots.
I think you can use the same idea but make the constant strip 100%
small dot and the gradient strip the large dot. This is basically
what I measure. I like your idea about making the different ranges
for each dot size, I may have to try something similar. (I've been
using an environment variable to force single dots but this
requires 3 print jobs not 1).
I'll have to give that a try.
--
Robert Krawitz <rlk at alum.mit.edu>
Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2
Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail lpf at uunet.uu.net
Project lead for Gutenprint -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net
"Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works."
--Eric Crampton
More information about the openicc
mailing list