[Openicc] Drop size calibration
edmund ronald
edmundronald at gmail.com
Mon Feb 4 05:32:57 PST 2008
Basically, and instrument needs to calibrate, measure, and write ASCII
values to the ouput.
Why do we need this thing to be installable across multiple
distributions ? Create a small "virtual appliance" Linux box where the
binary driver works, and then distribute this virtual appliance to
people who can add a few wrappers to make it communicate with the
outside world - no X and no complicated software dependencies inside
the box.
My trust in a newly released hardware instrument is usually exactly
*zero* until I have tested it. Why should I trust an open-source
instrument driver that is not encapsulated ? Guaranteeing output and
testing an instrument and its driver is the job of the hardware maker.
Edmund
> > I agree, but first things first -- let's figure out how to use them,
> > and then figure out how to put together tools necessary for a
> > reasonable workflow.
> >
> > It seems that in the past, from what people have told me off-list,
> > Xrite were willing to designate a maintainer who would distribute
> > binaries, maybe one distribution could be chosen for users who just
> > want to get on with their work, and act as a reference
> > implementation under which everything *just works* ?
> >
> > Do you mean one particular Linux distribution? I don't think that
> > that's going to fly very well.
> >
> > Frankly, I think one could for the benefit of everybody consider
> > that the driver of a piece of hardware is a part of the hardware,
> > and if the supplier of the hardware is prepared to somehow finance
> > or encourage the driver development and affirm they will support it
> > then one should not oppose this on purely philosophical grounds.
> >
More information about the openicc
mailing list