[Openicc] colord 0.1.0 released!

[Leonard Rosenthol]

On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Graeme Gill <graeme at argyllcms.com> wrote:

> Perhaps the simplest approach is to say that PDF/X-3/4/5 are not suitable
> profile or calibration test chart formats.


Which is fine...



> It's been suggested at least twice to the ISO 32000 committee and both
>>> times
>>
>> it's been rejected, because it's not clear what it means in all contexts.
>>  For example, does it used when rendering to screen?  What about if the
>> screen is simulating a printer (aka "Overprint Preview")??   etc. etc.
>> etc.
>>
>
> It wouldn't seem all that hard, if the clear purpose is to facilitate
> profiling.
>
>
So then such a flag would only be respecting when profiling?  In which case,
it doesn't belong in ISO 32000 - and instead should be a 3rd party extension
with appropriate second class name that someone defines and we all agree to.
 No problem there!



> If there are rendered elements that don't apply (because they are not
> in the intended device profiling space, or the actual device space
> is not the intended device profiling space), you have the usual options:
>
>        Reject the file.
>        Ignore those elements (don't render them).
>
>
Neither are acceptable options for PDF.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/openicc/attachments/20110120/188490a4/attachment.html>