[Openicc] GoSoC 2011: CPD and ... Mike Sweet workflow

[edmund ronald]

Yup.

E.

On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Chris Murphy <lists at colorremedies.com>wrote:

>
>
> On May 13, 2011, at 4:45 PM, edmund ronald wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Chris Murphy <lists at colorremedies.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> >
>> > If this is the way Apple sees it, no wonder there are a lot
>> > of angry Color professionals out there. I certainly wouldn't
>> > want to see any of the Linux systems to go down this route.
>>
>> Again, I don't think we need to worry about this on Linux. It requires a
>> massive distortion of reality and denial to come up with something this
>> overly complicated that has consistently not worked for every single party
>> involved: Apple, Adobe, HP, Epson, Canon, and all of their users have had
>> nothing but problems with this scheme since it hatched, and was predicted it
>> would be a huge problem, in advance, by 1/2 dozen people when the egg was
>> laid, including yours truly
>
>
> At least Apple has had color management for a loooong time. It's
> interesting to note that we are critiquing Apple in a thread that started
> with Linux, and it looks like it will take 5 years to attain the same level
> of maturity on Linux.
>
>
> Most of the color management photographers depend on is based on the work
> Adobe has done. And that functionality is the same on Mac OS and Windows. If
> those Adobe apps were on Linux, I would expect it would function in a
> similar manner except easier for Adobe because there's nothing they'd have
> to either opt-in or opt-out of except their own stuff.
>
> Chris Murphy
>
> _______________________________________________
> openicc mailing list
> openicc at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/openicc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/openicc/attachments/20110514/e998e0f8/attachment.html>