[Openicc] Extra metadata keys for review

[Ann McCarthy]

The reference to the standard does not encompass the issue of the potential
different transforms.

Best regards,
Ann L McCarthy
Imaging Systems Architect
Lexmark International, Inc.



On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Michael Sweet <msweet at apple.com> wrote:

> The normal way you deal with things like this is to define a
> keyword/string and provide a normative reference to the standard that
> defines it.  This isn't something you'd show directly in UI anyways
> (right?!? :)
>
>
> On May 8, 2012, at 1:59 AM, Richard Hughes <hughsient at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 7 May 2012 22:39, Chris Murphy <lists at colorremedies.com> wrote:
> >> Likewise sRGB is derived from ITU-R BT.709 (or Rec. 709).
> >
> > Sure, but no user calls it "ITU-R BT.709".
> >
> >> Likewise "adobe rgb" does not exist, it's specifically "Adobe RGB
> (1998)"
> >
> > Right, agreed, but "Adobe RGB (1998)" sucks as an enumerated name. If
> > there's a trademark issue (which I'm pretty sure there won't be) we
> > just call it clay-rgb like Argyllcms does.
> >
> > Richard.
> > _______________________________________________
> > openicc mailing list
> > openicc at lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/openicc
>
> __________________________________________________
> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
>
> _______________________________________________
> openicc mailing list
> openicc at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/openicc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/openicc/attachments/20120509/f75dc9a2/attachment.htm>