ANNOUNCE: p11-kit 0.9

[Andreas Metzler]

On 2011-12-14 Stef Walter <stefw at collabora.co.uk> wrote:
> On 2011-12-10 11:06, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
>> The minimal change I found was to just build CuFailInternal() without
>> optimization, by setting
 
>> __attribute__((optimize("O0")))
>> static void CuFailInternal(CuTest* tc, const char* file, int line,
>> CuString* string)

> Hmmm, I can see this behavior now. If I slightly rearrange any code it
> goes away, and that's why it may be that the above seemingly unrelated
> change fixes the issue.

> What's happening is that in the test__p11_hash_set_get_clear() gcc is
> reordering function calls. The line _p11_hash_clear() is running after
> the last _p11_hash_get() call, even though it's located before it. I've
> verified this with output to stderr :(

> So I'm a bit stuck, not sure if I should just refactor the tests to get
> around the obviously broken compiler, or should I try and take this
> upstream? Trying to track down where...

> The gcc version that I can replicate the issue on is "Ubuntu/Linaro
> 4.6.1-9ubuntu3".
[...]

Hello,

FWIW I have tried reporting this to the Debian bts
http://bugs.debian.org/651595 (bug report cced)
cu andreas