p11_kit_initialize_registered in a constructor
nmav at redhat.com
Mon Dec 9 02:01:12 PST 2013
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 08:34 +0100, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> > On the other hand, the behavior of C_Initialize for various PKCS#11
> > modules is far from well-behaved. Some of them take many tens of seconds
> > to complete.
> > I would suggest using the new p11-kit API, and loading the modules, but
> > not initializing them until use.
> I guess you mean splitting p11_kit_modules_load_and_initialize() to
> p11_kit_modules_load() and p11_kit_modules_initialize() (btw. these
> functions are not in the API index of the web-site manual).
Another question on that. Is there any particular advantage in loading
them at a constructor and initializing later, rather than simply loading
and initializing when needed?
More information about the p11-glue