[packagekit] yum requirements -- can and cannot remove gimp

Richard Hughes hughsient at gmail.com
Wed Nov 7 14:52:53 PST 2007

On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 21:50 +0100, Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 2007-11-07, 13:58 GMT, Ken VanDine wrote:
> > I disagree about pkcon being just for testing...  PackageKit 
> > represents a common UI for multiple packaging systems.  I think 
> > sharing a common UI, both GUI and CLI is valuable.  We should 
> > definately treat pkcon as a first class citizen.  
> +1
> moreover, blaming pkcon is just a merciful lie, because 
> pk-application cannot do the same either. So, Tim, what is meant 
> to be used for real when it is neither pkcon nor pk-application?

Have a look at the attached UI, which I've just commited into
gnome-packagekit; 2d7628f0e2aea5acc6de9c7073e4b85e1c43ada6

I guess we just do something like this for pkcon. I'm no console dude,
so I'm not sure how to ask for confirmation. The logic can certainly
stay the same as the GUI program.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pk-remove-confirm.png
Type: image/png
Size: 28871 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/packagekit/attachments/20071107/0f7135ed/attachment-0004.png>

More information about the PackageKit mailing list