[packagekit] Categories/Groups in yum on a Fedora system
Tim Lauridsen
tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com
Tue Oct 30 12:31:22 PDT 2007
Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 08:01 +0100, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
>
>>> GROUP_PROGRAMMING_WEB, GROUP_PROGRAMMING_JAVA, GROUP_PROGRAMMING_WEB?
>>>
>>>
>> Fine to me, but why GROUP_PROGRAMMING_WEB twice :)
>>
>
> I've added the rest, but I'm not sure how much we want to split the
> programming classes. I really don't want
> GROUP_PROGRAMMING_{every_language_known_to_man} in the enum list.
>
>
I Agree .
GROUP_PROGRAMMING_COBOL, GROUP_PROGRAMMING_PL1 etc is a bad idea
But here are some candidates:
GROUP_PROGRAMMING_LIBS
GROUP_PROGRAMMING_GNOME
GROUP_PROGRAMMING_KDE
GROUP_PROGRAMMING_TOOLS
It would be a good idea to split up the GROUP_DESKTOPS group
GROUP_DESKTOPS_GNOME
GROUP_DESKTOPS_KDE
GROUP_DESKTOPS_XFCE
A Gnome user will want to look at Gnome apps and a KDE user want to see KDE apps etc.
I still think some kind of TreeView with the be better as the number of groups grow.
-Programing (GROUP_PROGRAMMING)
Libraries (GROUP_PROGRAMMING_LIBS)
Gnome (GROUP_PROGRAMMING_GNOME)
KDE (GROUP_PROGRAMMING_KDE)
Tools (GROUP_PROGRAMMING_TOOLS)
-Desktop (GROUP_DESKTOPS)
GNOME (GROUP_DESKTOPS_GNOME)
KDE (GROUP_DESKTOPS_KDE)
XFCE (GROUP_DESKTOPS_XFCE)
Tim
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/packagekit/attachments/20071030/6430aa46/attachment-0003.htm>
More information about the PackageKit
mailing list