[packagekit] Ignoring updates

[Jesse Keating]

On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 11:06 -0400, Robin Norwood wrote:
> 
> If we want to implement this on a more permanent basis, we really need
> to decide if PK works with the backends existing configuration, or if
> it always does it's own thing - as a design decision for PK as a
> whole.  I lean towards using the backend's existing configuration,
> including changing it when you change something in PK.

So that again begs the questions I posted before.  How do we infer,
without throwing up lots of scary ui, what the user actually wants?

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/packagekit/attachments/20080415/7509fb39/attachment.pgp