[packagekit] Ignoring updates
Jesse Keating
jkeating at redhat.com
Tue Apr 15 08:12:20 PDT 2008
On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 11:03 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>
> How is "ignoring on a per-transaction basis" different from just not
> selecting the
> update ? This would fall somewhat short of matching the similar OS X
> feature that
> is described here: http://www.xvsxp.com/system/os_updates.php
Ok, reading that it sounds a lot like "ignore this single update" and
not any future updates of said software. That's a lot less intrusive
and likely does (in the yum case) belong in yum.conf, so that you won't
have to re-ignore it from other repos. Re-opening and re-editing config
files for an application you don't own is somewhat scary, especially
because it then makes that file modified in the rpm sense and you wind
up with .rpmnew files littered about during upgrades, and maychance miss
important config updates.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/packagekit/attachments/20080415/fefc8017/attachment.pgp
More information about the PackageKit
mailing list