[packagekit] libpackagekit-gnome

[Jesse Keating]

On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 15:46 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> Well, some packagers don't sign their packages (myself as an example)
> although that might be a good way to start enforcing people like me
> to!

Rawhide will continually have unsigned packages until we get a signing
server in place.  Developer done scratch builds may too.  Requiring gpg
signed (and then client imported) packages for everything seems a bit...
much.  This is why yum has the config option and cli flag to not care
about gpg.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/packagekit/attachments/20080414/46884419/attachment-0004.pgp>