[packagekit] Res: libpackagekit and docs

dantti85-pk at yahoo.com.br dantti85-pk at yahoo.com.br
Thu Aug 14 08:21:17 PDT 2008

>Sounds like a typo. Where did you see that?

>Got a file name and line number? If it's obvious please change it
yourself. Thanks dude.

it's not pretty obvious to me, because i'm not sure this is the right
method, or signal.. my glib foo is far from good..
i've made a better search but i think that only
the params description is missing: (and i'm not sure what
i should put on the new one.. so it up to you :P  )

libpackekit/pk-client.c : 3354
     * PkClient::update-detail:
     * @client: the #PkClient instance that emitted the signal
     * @package_id: the package_id of the package
     * @updates: the list of packages the update updates
     * @obsoletes: the list of packages the update obsoletes
     * @vendor_url: the list of vendor URL's of the update
     * @bugzilla_url: the list of bugzilla URL's of the update
     * @cve_url: the list of CVE URL's of the update
     * @restart: the #PkRestartEnum of the update, e.g. PK_RESTART_ENUM_SYSTEM
     * @update_text: the update summary of the update
     * The ::update-detail signal is emitted when GetUpdateDetail() is
     * called on a set of package_id's.


----- Mensagem original ----
De: Richard Hughes <hughsient at gmail.com>
Para: PackageKit users and developers list <packagekit at lists.freedesktop.org>
Enviadas: Quinta-feira, 14 de Agosto de 2008 3:55:54
Assunto: Re: [packagekit] libpackagekit and docs

On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 19:05 -0700, dantti85-pk at yahoo.com.br wrote:
> Hi, i was creating the docs of lipackagekit-qt
> and noticed an outdated page about libpackagekit,
> the concepts of package id are a little wrong, maybe a typo
> when wanting to say info you say data...

Sounds like a typo. Where did you see that?

> but not only that.
> and the pk-client.c still not have
> the descriptions (nor the signal) of the new
> values.

Got a file name and line number? If it's obvious please change it
yourself. Thanks dude.

> to be honest i don't know if Richard is still
> thinking if this changes will be on 0.3

I think the API in master is pretty much what you're going to see in

> And the docs of libpackagekit-qt are almost done
> which also make me create lots of new convenience
> methods and improve some others. The docs of
> libpackagekit helped a lot on creating the qt one.. 
> BTW is there a copyright that forbids me
> copying the same text? :P

Well, it's under the GPLv2+ licence, but as I htink you are also under
GPLv2+, copy away :-)


PackageKit mailing list
PackageKit at lists.freedesktop.org

      Novos endereços, o Yahoo! que você conhece. Crie um email novo com a sua cara @ymail.com ou @rocketmail.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/packagekit/attachments/20080814/85d5228a/attachment-0004.htm>

More information about the PackageKit mailing list