[packagekit] This dialog sucks

[Patryk Zawadzki]

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Richard Hughes <hughsient at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 13:19 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>> On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 13:13 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
>> > The attached dialog for agreeing to a repository signature sucks. If
>> > you've got any ideas how to make it prettier, I'm all ears.
>> >
>> > I'm pretty sure we have to show all the information, and I'm not sure
>> > there's much we can do that's clever. I know we talked of whitelisting
>> > "safe" keys, but that didn't go down well with RH legal. We also can't
>> > do this internally to PK, as it doesn't make sense to have a rpmfusion
>> > key installed on an ubuntu machine.
>> >
>> > I'm looking for radical ideas, as well as HIG suggestions. Thanks.
>> Seahorse (or whatever the GNOME GnuPG front-end is called nowadays)
>> integration?
> Sure, but doing what? What are we actually using seahorse to do?

Add "trusted repositories" tab in Seahorse? That would of course
require Seahorse knowing how to talk to apt and rpm. Or the other way
around, making Seahorse talk to PackageKit but providing its own
interface.

I'm not sure if it makes much sense as Seahorse is currently managing
private keyrings, not system ones.

-- 
Patryk Zawadzki