[packagekit] APT-RPM (smart)
Anders F Björklund
afb at algonet.se
Wed Apr 22 08:45:39 PDT 2009
Sebastian Heinlein wrote:
> APT-RPM is not API compatible with Debian APT. Most likely the smart
> backend would be a better choice on these distros but I cannot comment
> on its state.
The smart backend should be functional, but has a few shortcomings...
- smart doesn't have a distribution attached, so no GetDistroUpgrades
(and no Visible or Supported or similar distro distinctions either)
- the "cold" cache load takes ages, but is done every time it starts
(the regular Smart interface only does this when starting the app)
- only installed packages have file lists, not uninstalled packages
(which means that it can't be used to get icons/translations/etc)
- package dependencies might not include codecs/fonts/firmware/etc
(depends on the package backend, it does search all the provides)
- signature installation support has not been included upstream yet
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/smart/+bug/245643)
- update errata detail support has not been included upstream yet
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/smart/+bug/253902)
- pack installation support has not been included upstream yet
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/smart/+bug/263756)
- license field support has not been included upstream yet
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/smart/+bug/254150)
- collections support has not been included upstream yet
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/smart/+bug/244969)
- changelog support has not been included upstream yet
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/smart/+bug/245338)
Other than that, it should work for rpm/deb/slack as far as I know.
--anders
More information about the PackageKit
mailing list