[packagekit] Patch to add connman network stack support

Richard Hughes hughsient at gmail.com
Mon Jun 1 08:10:14 PDT 2009


On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Matthias Clasen
<matthias.clasen at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Richard Hughes <hughsient at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Matthias Clasen
>> <matthias.clasen at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I must say I'd much rather see connman and NM support a common
>>> interface for network status than patching all the world to support
>>> the network management app of the week...
>>
>> The API between NM and CM looks very different, and it might be hard
>> to convince the CM developers to support all the NM properties and
>> features. CM is a much smaller and simpler stack than NM.
>
> Thats why I intentionally said 'common interface for network status'.
> I don't have any illusions about these two supporting the same api in
> general, but network status is what 95% of all clients want to know,
> and that should be trivial enough to share.

Sure, I would agree with that. PackageKit only really cares about the
connection status and the connection type. NM sure makes that tricky
to get.

Richard.


More information about the PackageKit mailing list