[packagekit] Extending the RepoDetail signal

Anders F Björklund afb at algonet.se
Thu Oct 7 07:02:17 PDT 2010


James Antill wrote:

>> Currently yum doesn't make a difference between, which causes some
>> problems for other clients. Or maybe that is more of a backend  
>> worry ?
>>
>> But "gpgcheck=1" can mean either.
>
>  From man yum.conf (localpkg_gpgcheck is new):
>
>               gpgcheck Either ‘1’ or ‘0’. This tells yum  whether   
> or  not  it
>               should  perform  a GPG signature check on packages.  
> When this is
>               set in the [main] section it sets the default for  
> all  reposito-
>               ries.  The default is ‘0’.
>
>               localpkg_gpgcheck  Either  ‘1’ or ‘0’. This tells yum  
> whether or
>               not it should perform a GPG signature check  on   
> local  packages
>               (packages in a file, not in a repositoy).  The  
> default is ‘0’.
>
>               repo_gpgcheck  Either  ‘1’ or ‘0’. This tells yum  
> whether or not
>               it should perform a GPG signature check on  the   
> repodata.  When
>               this  is  set  in the [main] section it sets the  
> default for all
>               repositories. The default is ‘0’.

Thanks for clarifying. So only repo_gpgcheck for Yum, then.
It was the ZYpp's .repo that was using "gpgcheck" for both.

http://lists.opensuse.org/zypp-devel/2010-06/msg00015.html
says: Seems like zypp's "gpgcheck" is yum's "repo_gpgcheck".

--anders




More information about the PackageKit mailing list