[packagekit] Extending the RepoDetail signal
Anders F Björklund
afb at algonet.se
Thu Oct 7 07:02:17 PDT 2010
James Antill wrote:
>> Currently yum doesn't make a difference between, which causes some
>> problems for other clients. Or maybe that is more of a backend
>> worry ?
>>
>> But "gpgcheck=1" can mean either.
>
> From man yum.conf (localpkg_gpgcheck is new):
>
> gpgcheck Either ‘1’ or ‘0’. This tells yum whether
> or not it
> should perform a GPG signature check on packages.
> When this is
> set in the [main] section it sets the default for
> all reposito-
> ries. The default is ‘0’.
>
> localpkg_gpgcheck Either ‘1’ or ‘0’. This tells yum
> whether or
> not it should perform a GPG signature check on
> local packages
> (packages in a file, not in a repositoy). The
> default is ‘0’.
>
> repo_gpgcheck Either ‘1’ or ‘0’. This tells yum
> whether or not
> it should perform a GPG signature check on the
> repodata. When
> this is set in the [main] section it sets the
> default for all
> repositories. The default is ‘0’.
Thanks for clarifying. So only repo_gpgcheck for Yum, then.
It was the ZYpp's .repo that was using "gpgcheck" for both.
http://lists.opensuse.org/zypp-devel/2010-06/msg00015.html
says: Seems like zypp's "gpgcheck" is yum's "repo_gpgcheck".
--anders
More information about the PackageKit
mailing list