[packagekit] GNOME PackageKit: requires/dependent packages are semantically reversed
Michael Catanzaro
mcatanzaro at gnome.org
Wed Aug 21 06:01:33 PDT 2013
On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 09:40 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> I think it depends on the way you look at this. When I started PK, I
> added GetDepends to get the list of packages that the package depends
> on, and GetRequires to get all the packages that depend on this
> package.
Yeah that makes sense to me. That's the reverse of the actions implied
by the buttons (nobody would say "Dependent Packages means packages I
depend on" which would be like a kid claiming his parents as dependents
on a tax form, or "Required Packages means packages that require me") so
I guess we'll just reverse our usage of those function calls in
gnome-packagekit.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/packagekit/attachments/20130821/4e4691d5/attachment.pgp>
More information about the PackageKit
mailing list