[Piglit] [PATCH 07/12] glx_arb_create_context: Verify that the invalid attributes are rejected

Ian Romanick idr at freedesktop.org
Tue Dec 20 13:01:16 PST 2011


On 12/20/2011 12:06 PM, Chad Versace wrote:
> On 12/14/2011 10:47 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>> From: Ian Romanick<ian.d.romanick at intel.com>
>>
>> NVIDIA's closed-source driver fails this test because it generates the
>> wrong X error (BadMatch instead of BadValue).  It correctly does not
>> create the context.
>>
>> AMD's closed-source driver fails this test becuase it creates contexts
>> with invalid attributes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick<ian.d.romanick at intel.com>
>> ---
>>   tests/all.tests                                    |    1 +
>>   .../spec/glx_arb_create_context/CMakeLists.gl.txt  |    1 +
>>   .../glx_arb_create_context/invalid-attribute.c     |   87 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>   3 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>   create mode 100644 tests/spec/glx_arb_create_context/invalid-attribute.c
>>
>
> I think that the probing for GLX_CONTEXT_PROFILE_MASK_ARB needs to be more thorough and
> check that bits {(1<<n)|n=3..31} are invalid.
>
> Perhaps change the signature of try_attribute() to try_attribute(int attr, int value) and
> loop over those invalid bits?

The check here is that it's invalid to ask for *any* profile when the GL 
version is less than 3.2.  I wanted to check that 
GLX_CONTEXT_PROFILE_MASK_ARB is rejected because of the attribute and 
not because of its value.  Should I add a comment to that effect?

Once we add support for GLX_ARB_create_context_profile, I think we 
should have a test like the existing flags test.  At that time, I'm 
inclined to have it as a separate test.


More information about the Piglit mailing list