[Piglit] [PATCH] gtf: Update EGLConfig ID

[Kenneth Graunke]

On 10/08/2012 03:21 PM, Chad Versace wrote:
> The mesa commit 7dc0be8 changed the EGLConfig ID's for the Intel driver,
> and piglit's GTF integration hardcodes the EGLConfig ID.  (Apparently,
> this implies that piglit's GTF integration only works the Intel driver...
> hmm).

Most people don't have a copy...

> The old -id=10 and new -id=7 should be the same underlying DRIConfig.
> Anyway, the two configs are close enough that the GTF results don't
> change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chad Versace <chad.versace at linux.intel.com>
> ---
>   tests/gtf.tests | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/gtf.tests b/tests/gtf.tests
> index cade81a..572c729 100644
> --- a/tests/gtf.tests
> +++ b/tests/gtf.tests
> @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ class GTFTest(ExecTest):
>       pass_re = re.compile(r'Regression PASSED all 1 tests')
>
>       def __init__(self, testpath):
> -        ExecTest.__init__(self, [path.join(testBinDir, 'GTF'), '-noimagefileio', '-width=113', '-height=47', '-seed=2', '-id=10', '-run=' + testpath])
> +        ExecTest.__init__(self, [path.join(testBinDir, 'GTF'), '-noimagefileio', '-width=113', '-height=47', '-seed=2', '-id=7', '-run=' + testpath])
>
>       def interpretResult(self, out, results):
>   	if self.pass_re.search(out) is not None:

NAK.  We used to use 7, but it doesn't have alpha bits, and we 
definitely missed bugs because of that.

Try 0x47 (71), 0x48 (72), 0x59 (89), or 0x5a (90).  I'm not sure what 
the difference is, since eglinfo just prints ms/ns/b, which isn't 
ringing any bells...