[Piglit] [PATCH] Add a test for GLES2 using GL_EXT_unpack_subimage with GL_BGRA_EXT
Ian Romanick
idr at freedesktop.org
Tue Oct 9 14:35:11 PDT 2012
On 10/05/2012 03:27 AM, Neil Roberts wrote:
> Eric Anholt <eric at anholt.net> writes:
>
>> If this is testing GL_EXT_unpack_subimage, it should go in
>> tests/spec/gl_ext_unpack_subimage/
>
> It's not really testing GL_EXT_unpack_subimage but is testing a specific
> bug in the Intel driver when uploading a subregion of a BGR image. There
> is already a test for GL_EXT_unpack_subimage and this test case borrows
To add a bit more background, this is OpenGL 1.0 functionality that was
removed in GLES. It was added back by GL_EXT_unpack_subimage. The
generic texturing tests currently live in tests/texturing. Is that
maybe a better place? I agree that tests/bugs was a mistake.
> some code from it. Maybe it would make more sense to convert this test
> to use regular GL. Then it wouldn't need a shader and could be quite a
> bit simpler. However, the bug was found via Wayland which is using GLES2
> so it seemed like a good way to replicate the bug.
One of our dreams and goals is for tests like this to be able to run in
both desktop GL and GLES[123] mode. The Waffle work is getting us
closer to that goal.
>>> +static GLboolean pass;
>>
>> I'm assuming Brian's review covered most everything, but as a note:
>> We're trying to move to reasonable C types like bool for everything that
>> isn't specified by GL API.
>
> I think Rob is adapting the test case for Brian's changes so hopefully
> he can incorporate this suggestion too.
>
> Regards,
> - Neil
> _______________________________________________
> Piglit mailing list
> Piglit at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
More information about the Piglit
mailing list