[Piglit] [PATCH] texture-integer-glsl130: fix random failures with wrong expected alpha values
Carl Worth
cworth at cworth.org
Wed Jan 23 17:20:37 PST 2013
From: Roland Scheidegger <sroland at vmware.com>
The logic failed whenever the random number was 0 for formats which don't have
an alpha channel. In this case all of expected/bias/value were 0 but the
actual
correct read back value is 1.0 (default value for alpha channel sampling for
integer textures is 1 just like it is 1.0 for ordinary texture formats).
Reviewed-by: Brian Paul <brianp at vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: Jose Fonseca <jfonseca at vmware.com>
Edited-by: Carl Worth <cworth at cworth.org>
Use integer literals, not floating-point to assign to integer
array. Add a comment describing the tweak of values for texture
formats without some channels.
---
I just ran into this same problem with this test, (lucky me, I got a
value of 0 for alpha from "rand() % max"), and needed to chase down this
fix.
This fix should be applied right away. But we should also seriously
consider updating this test so that's behavior is deterministic. One
option would be to just using something like this to replace rand():
static unsigned long next = 1;
/* RAND_MAX assumed to be 32767 */
int myrand(void) {
next = next * 1103515245 + 12345;
return((unsigned)(next/65536) % 32768);
}
[From Linux man-pages RAND(3)]
-Carl
.../ext_texture_integer/texture-integer-glsl130.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/spec/ext_texture_integer/texture-integer-glsl130.c b/tests/spec/ext_texture_integer/texture-integer-glsl130.c
index 17b02bc..2d392bc 100644
--- a/tests/spec/ext_texture_integer/texture-integer-glsl130.c
+++ b/tests/spec/ext_texture_integer/texture-integer-glsl130.c
@@ -358,7 +358,16 @@ test_format(const struct format_info *info)
expected[2] = 0.75;
expected[3] = 1.00;
- /* need to swizzle things depending on texture format */
+ /* Need to swizzle things depending on texture format.
+ *
+ * Also, for texture formats with no storage for a particular
+ * channel, instead of reading the randomly-chosen value
+ * above, we need to expect to read a 0, (for Green or Blue
+ * channels), or a 1 (for Alpha).
+ *
+ * Note: The alpha value read is an integer 1, not a
+ * maximum-valued integer representing 1.0.
+ */
switch (info->BaseFormat) {
case GL_RGBA_INTEGER_EXT:
/* nothing */
@@ -373,10 +382,11 @@ test_format(const struct format_info *info)
value[0] = temp;
break;
case GL_RGB_INTEGER_EXT:
- expected[3] = 0.0;
+ value[3] = 1;
break;
case GL_RG_INTEGER:
- expected[2] = expected[3] = 0.0;
+ value[2] = 0;
+ value[3] = 1;
break;
case GL_ALPHA_INTEGER_EXT:
expected[0] = expected[1] = expected[2] = 0.0;
@@ -404,7 +414,8 @@ test_format(const struct format_info *info)
expected[0] = expected[1] = expected[2] = expected[3] = 0.25;
value[1] = value[2] = value[3] = value[0];
} else {
- expected[1] = expected[2] = expected[3] = 0.0;
+ value[1] = value[2] = 0;
+ value[3] = 1;
}
break;
default:
--
1.7.10.4
More information about the Piglit
mailing list