[Piglit] glslparsertest/glsl2/local-function-03.frag

[Chris Forbes]

I'm not sure you quoted the bit of spec you intended to, but that test
looks pretty bogus at a first glance.

-- Chris

On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 8:08 PM, chris <wwzbwwzb at 163.com> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I run this test(glslparsertest/glsl2/local-function-03.frag),and I think it
> is may be bug of piglit.
>
> As spec, this test should be fail, but pass, since declaration function in
> not in global scope should be an error.
>
> Is there anyone noticed this test?
>
> // [config]
> // expect_result: pass
> // glsl_version: 1.10
> //
> // # NOTE: Config section was auto-generated from file
> // # NOTE: 'glslparser.tests' at git revision
> // # NOTE: 6cc17ae70b70d150aa1751f8e28db7b2a9bd50f0
> // [end config]
>
> /* PASS - local function declarations are not allowed in GLSL 1.10. */
> #version 110
> void main() {
>     float foo(float x);
>     gl_FragColor = vec4(0.0, foo(0.5), 0.0, 1.0);
> }
>
> float foo(float x) {
>     return x + 0.5;
> }
>
> In glsl 1.1.0  section 6.1.1:
> The const qualifier cannot be used with out or inout, or a compile-time
> error results.  The above is used
> both for function declarations (i.e., prototypes) and for function
> definitions.  Hence, function definitions
> can have unnamed arguments.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Piglit mailing list
> Piglit at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
>