[Piglit] [PATCH] tests/spec: ARB_debug_output fix false fail

Timothy Arceri t_arceri at yahoo.com.au
Fri Sep 6 16:40:13 PDT 2013


On 07/09/13 04:40, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 09/06/2013 02:32 AM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
>> Updates to the implementation after implementing KHR_debug means that either
>> GL_DEBUG_OUTPUT needs to be enabled or CONTEXT_DEBUG_BIT bit set for the message
>> log to be enabled.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Timothy Arceri <t_arceri at yahoo.com.au>
>> ---
>>   tests/spec/arb_debug_output/api_error.c |    1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/spec/arb_debug_output/api_error.c b/tests/spec/arb_debug_output/api_error.c
>> index 61467c3..bd69965 100644
>> --- a/tests/spec/arb_debug_output/api_error.c
>> +++ b/tests/spec/arb_debug_output/api_error.c
>> @@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ void piglit_init(int argc, char **argv)
>>      piglit_require_extension("GL_ARB_debug_output");
>>   
>>      glEnable(GL_DEBUG_OUTPUT_SYNCHRONOUS_ARB);
>> +   glEnable(GL_DEBUG_OUTPUT);
> This needs to at least be guarded by 'if
> (piglit_is_extension_supported("GL_KHR_debug"))'.  Otherwise, an
> implementation that only supports the GL_ARB_debug_output (e.g.,
> shipping Mesa 9.2 implementations) will generate a GL_INVALID_ENUM error
> here.
Yes I should have realised that. I've submitted a V2
>
> I think we need to get a way in piglit to request a debug context, and
> we should only expose this extension from Mesa in a debug context...
> perhaps with an environment variable to over-ride.  The ARB_debug_output
> spec even recommends this:
>
>      "For performance reasons it is recommended, but not required, that
>      implementations restrict supporting this extension only to
>      contexts created using the debug flag as provided by
>      WGL_create_context or GLX_create_context.  This extension places no
>      limits on any other functionality provided by debug contexts through
>      other extensions."
>
> Perhaps Chad will have a suggestion for how to plumb that into piglit...
I would assume this would possibly involve moving some code from 
test/spec/glx_arb_create_context into a piglit util type setup. I did 
start looking into this at one point but was a little unsure how to 
proceed, suggestions would be appreciated.
>
>>      if (!piglit_check_gl_error(GL_NO_ERROR))
>>         piglit_report_result(PIGLIT_FAIL);
>>



More information about the Piglit mailing list