[Piglit] Crashing tests are not shown in the HTML summary

[Ilia Mirkin]

On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Marek Olšák <maraeo at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>> Before rewriting (fun though it is!), we should figure out what we'd
>> want to see, in a perfect world. Even that much isn't clear to me. Do
>> we want to promote test tree structure to first-class status, thus
>> being able to accurate express the situation? That would require HTML
>> changes as well, I think, since only leaves can have pass/fail status
>> right now, and everything else is just a n/m number. My hack should
>> make it clear what happened while also minimizing the amount of
>> change. I don't think that this is a common scenario (passing subtests
>> followed by crash), so just making it visible may be good enough.
>
> It's just as common as everything. It actually happened to me last
> week when I broke mipmap generation for some of the formats.

Perhaps I didn't phrase that correctly. It's a lot more common for
tests not to crash than it is for them to crash. We shouldn't optimize
for the case of it crashing at the expense of the non-crashing case,
that's all.