[Piglit] [PATCH 1/1] cl: fix clGetKernelWorkGroupInfo
EdB
edb+piglit at sigluy.net
Wed Aug 13 06:01:44 PDT 2014
On Tuesday 12 August 2014 17:25:37 Jan Vesely wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-08-10 at 16:46 +0200, EdB wrote:
> > From: EdB <edb at sigluy.net>
> >
> > If there is only one device associed with the kernel and device arg is
> > NULL
> > you don't have to trigger CL_INVALID_DEVICE
> > ---
> >
> > tests/cl/api/get-kernel-work-group-info.c | 31
> > +++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 12
> > deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/cl/api/get-kernel-work-group-info.c
> > b/tests/cl/api/get-kernel-work-group-info.c index 47d09da..bf0bb29 100644
> > --- a/tests/cl/api/get-kernel-work-group-info.c
> > +++ b/tests/cl/api/get-kernel-work-group-info.c
> > @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ piglit_cl_test(const int argc,
> >
> > int i;
> > cl_int errNo;
> > cl_kernel kernel;
> >
> > + cl_uint* dev_count_ptr;
> >
> > size_t param_value_size;
> > void* param_value;
> >
> > @@ -168,24 +169,30 @@ piglit_cl_test(const int argc,
> >
> > piglit_cl_get_error_name(errNo));
> >
> > piglit_merge_result(&result, PIGLIT_FAIL);
> >
> > }
> >
> > -
> > +
> >
> > /*
> >
> > * CL_INVALID_DEVICE if device is not in the list of devices
associated
> > with
> > * kernel or if device is NULL but there is more than one device
> > associated
> > * with kernel.
> > */
> >
> > - errNo = clGetKernelWorkGroupInfo(kernel,
> > - NULL,
> > - CL_KERNEL_WORK_GROUP_SIZE,
> > - 0,
> > - NULL,
> > - ¶m_value_size);
> > - if(!piglit_cl_check_error(errNo, CL_INVALID_DEVICE)) {
> > - fprintf(stderr,
> > - "Failed (error code: %s): Trigger CL_INVALID_DEVICE if
device
> > is NULL but there is more than one device associated with kernel.\n", -
> > piglit_cl_get_error_name(errNo));
> > - piglit_merge_result(&result, PIGLIT_FAIL);
> > + dev_count_ptr = piglit_cl_get_program_info(env->program,
> > CL_PROGRAM_NUM_DEVICES); + if (*dev_count_ptr != 1) {
> > + errNo = clGetKernelWorkGroupInfo(kernel,
> > + NULL,
> > + CL_KERNEL_WORK_GROUP_SIZE,
> > + 0,
> > + NULL,
> > + ¶m_value_size);
> > + if(!piglit_cl_check_error(errNo, CL_INVALID_DEVICE)) {
> > + if (*dev_count_ptr != 1) {
>
> What is the purpose of testing (*dev_count_ptr != 1) again? It's already
> in one big !=1 block.
It was the first attempt to fix the test, I forgot to remove it
>
> Moreover, can the number of devices ever be != 1 since the test is
> marked run_per_device?
> IMO this change effectively disables the subtest
Indeed. I was thinking that even if the test is per device, the program is
build only once (if not, why this test).
But you're right, piglit_cl_api_test_t rebuild the program per device
and this should always return CL_SUCCES
Thank for the review
>
> jan
>
> > + fprintf(stderr,
> > + "Failed (error code: %s): Trigger
CL_INVALID_DEVICE if device
> > is NULL but there is more than one device associated with kernel.\n",
> > + piglit_cl_get_error_name(errNo));
> > + piglit_merge_result(&result, PIGLIT_FAIL);
> > + }
> > + }
> >
> > }
> >
> > + free(dev_count_ptr);
> >
> > clReleaseKernel(kernel);
More information about the Piglit
mailing list