[Piglit] [PATCH 2/2] teximage-errors: Test the combinations of depth and depth-stencil formats
Brian Paul
brianp at vmware.com
Wed Mar 12 06:24:38 PDT 2014
On 03/11/2014 06:51 PM, Anuj Phogat wrote:
> This patch is to verify a bug fix in mesa commit 079bff5. This commit
> allowed GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT and GL_DEPTH_STENCIL combinations in
> glTexImage{123}D functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anuj Phogat <anuj.phogat at gmail.com>
> ---
> tests/texturing/teximage-errors.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/texturing/teximage-errors.c b/tests/texturing/teximage-errors.c
> index 39b7e9b..c01c5e0 100644
> --- a/tests/texturing/teximage-errors.c
> +++ b/tests/texturing/teximage-errors.c
> @@ -36,7 +36,37 @@ PIGLIT_GL_TEST_CONFIG_BEGIN
>
> PIGLIT_GL_TEST_CONFIG_END
>
> +struct format_desc {
> + GLenum internalformat;
> + GLenum format;
> + GLenum type;
> +};
>
> +static const struct format_desc formats_allowed[] = {
> + {GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT16, GL_DEPTH_STENCIL, GL_UNSIGNED_INT_24_8},
> + {GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT24, GL_DEPTH_STENCIL, GL_UNSIGNED_INT_24_8},
> + {GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT32F, GL_DEPTH_STENCIL, GL_UNSIGNED_INT_24_8},
> +
> + {GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT16, GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT, GL_FLOAT},
> + {GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT24, GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT, GL_FLOAT},
> + {GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT32F, GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT, GL_FLOAT},
> +
> + {GL_DEPTH24_STENCIL8, GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT, GL_FLOAT},
> + {GL_DEPTH32F_STENCIL8, GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT, GL_FLOAT},
So for that combination, do the texture's stencil values get set to zero?
> + {GL_DEPTH24_STENCIL8, GL_DEPTH_STENCIL, GL_UNSIGNED_INT_24_8},
> + {GL_DEPTH32F_STENCIL8, GL_DEPTH_STENCIL, GL_UNSIGNED_INT_24_8}};
> +
> +static const struct format_desc formats_not_allowed[] = {
> + {GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT16, GL_STENCIL_INDEX, GL_INT},
> + {GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT24, GL_STENCIL_INDEX, GL_INT},
> + {GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT32F, GL_STENCIL_INDEX, GL_INT},
> +
> + {GL_DEPTH24_STENCIL8, GL_STENCIL_INDEX, GL_INT},
> + {GL_DEPTH32F_STENCIL8, GL_STENCIL_INDEX, GL_INT},
> +
> + {GL_RGBA8, GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT, GL_FLOAT},
> + {GL_RGBA8, GL_DEPTH_STENCIL, GL_UNSIGNED_INT_24_8}};
>
> /** Test target params to glTexImage functions */
> static GLboolean
> @@ -167,7 +197,34 @@ test_pos_and_sizes(void)
> return GL_TRUE;
> }
>
> -
> +/* Test the combinations of depth formats in glTexImage{123}D() */
> +static GLboolean
bool
> +test_depth_formats(const struct format_desc *test, GLenum expected_error,
> + GLint n_tests)
> +{
> + int i;
> + bool result = true;
> +
> + for(i = 0; i < n_tests; i++) {
We usually put a space after "for" and "if"
> + if((test[i].internalformat == GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT32F ||
> + test[i].internalformat == GL_DEPTH32F_STENCIL8) &&
> + !piglit_is_extension_supported("GL_ARB_depth_buffer_float"))
> + continue;
> +
> + glTexImage1D(GL_TEXTURE_1D, 0, test[i].internalformat, 16, 0,
> + test[i].format, test[i].type, NULL);
> + result = piglit_check_gl_error(expected_error) && result;
> +
> + glTexImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0, test[i].internalformat, 16, 16,
> + 0, test[i].format, test[i].type, NULL);
> + result = piglit_check_gl_error(expected_error) && result;
> +
> + glTexImage3D(GL_TEXTURE_2D_ARRAY, 0, test[i].internalformat,
> + 16, 16, 16, 0, test[i].format, test[i].type, NULL);
Do we need to check if the texture array extension is available?
> + result = piglit_check_gl_error(expected_error) && result;
> + }
> + return result;
> +}
> enum piglit_result
> piglit_display(void)
> {
> @@ -175,6 +232,20 @@ piglit_display(void)
> pass = test_targets() && pass;
> pass = test_pos_and_sizes() && pass;
>
> + /* From OpenGL 3.3 spec, page 141:
> + * "Textures with a base internal format of DEPTH_COMPONENT or
> + * DEPTH_STENCIL require either depth component data or depth/stencil
> + * component data. Textures with other base internal formats require
> + * RGBA component data. The error INVALID_OPERATION is generated if
> + * one of the base internal format and format is DEPTH_COMPONENT or
> + * DEPTH_STENCIL, and the other is neither of these values."
> + */
> + pass = test_depth_formats(formats_allowed, GL_NO_ERROR,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(formats_allowed))
> + && pass;
> + pass = test_depth_formats(formats_not_allowed, GL_INVALID_OPERATION,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(formats_not_allowed))
> + && pass;
> return pass ? PIGLIT_PASS: PIGLIT_FAIL;
> }
>
>
Looks OK otherwise.
More information about the Piglit
mailing list