[Piglit] [PATCH 8/9] Added timeouts to tests that use SwapBuffersMsc.

Jamey Sharp jamey at minilop.net
Thu May 8 10:59:17 PDT 2014

Theo and I preferred this approach as it allows each test to determine what
a reasonable timeout should be, using dynamic information if desired.

Also, we understood that getting signal-safety right in the Python
framework was hard, so we figured this was less likely to break.

That said, we'd be happy to have these merged without timeout support if
that's what it takes. :-)

Thanks for reviewing these!
On May 8, 2014 10:49 AM, "Eric Anholt" <eric at anholt.net> wrote:

> Jamey Sharp <jamey at minilop.net> writes:
> > From: TheoH <Theo0x48 at gmail.com>
> >
> > We've observed hangs on some drivers in these calls, which make it
> > harder to run the rest of the Piglit test suite.
> I know people have been working on having timeout support in the
> framework, which seems much better than having it ad-hoc in tests that
> we've discovered already hang on some systems.  Any framework folks have
> status on that?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/piglit/attachments/20140508/e71f61e1/attachment.html>

More information about the Piglit mailing list