[Piglit] [PATCH] glsl-es-3.00: test for 'invariant(all)' usage in a fragment shader

[Dylan Baker]

On Friday, November 07, 2014 01:10:49 PM Tapani wrote:
> On 11/07/2014 12:40 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> > The test looks fine enough, but could you add a spec quotation to defend it?
> 
> ok, I'll send v2 of this together with few other tests
> 
> > On 11/04/2014 04:19 AM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Tapani Pälli <tapani.palli at intel.com>
> >> ---
> >>   tests/spec/glsl-es-3.00/compiler/invariant_all.frag | 12 ++++++++++++
> >>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> >>   create mode 100644 tests/spec/glsl-es-3.00/compiler/invariant_all.frag
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tests/spec/glsl-es-3.00/compiler/invariant_all.frag b/tests/spec/glsl-es-3.00/compiler/invariant_all.frag
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000..37031cf
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/tests/spec/glsl-es-3.00/compiler/invariant_all.frag
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> >> +#version 300 es
> > The #version shouldn't be necessary with the current infrastructure, right?
> 
> I put it there as the other tests had it. Also GLSL ES 1.00 does not 
> have such error so this is specific to the version.

Could you put it after the comment block as it is in the existing tests?
I think that will make it clearer

> 
> >> +// [config]
> >> +// expect_result: fail
> >> +// glsl_version: 3.00
> >> +// [end config]
> >> +//
> >> +// Check that 'invariant(all)' cannot be used in fragment shader
> >> +
> >> +#pragma STDGL invariant(all)
> >> +void main()
> >> +{
> >> +}
> >>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Piglit mailing list
> Piglit at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/piglit/attachments/20141107/373dc566/attachment.sig>