[Piglit] Add support to piglit to write JUnit XML directly

Jose Fonseca jfonseca at vmware.com
Thu Sep 4 05:59:51 PDT 2014

On 30/08/14 01:20, Dylan Baker wrote:
> On Friday, August 29, 2014 12:42:26 PM Jose Fonseca wrote:
>> Once this goes in I'll try to update our jenkins jobs to start using it,
>> and once all wrinkles are ironed out I'd be happy to remove the old one.
>> Jose
> Thanks Jose, that was what I was hoping you'd have a look at, since most
> of this series is just boring incremental API changes anyway.
> If no one says anything before then I'm planning to push this Monday or
> Tuesday, since the guy here doing the jenkins work is chomping at the
> bit to be able to use this.


I tried the new implementation.

I noticed one difference: the old implementation prefixed all test names 
with "piglit." super group.  The new doesn't causing some test to appear 
in the "(root)" group.  See attached screenshots.

Adding a "piglit." super group avoids the "(root)" test group, and also 
makes it easier to run multiple test suites side-by-side  (e.g., I have 
conform, and glretrace, all with unique top-level group.)

Otherwise looks ok

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: before.png
Type: image/png
Size: 10093 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/piglit/attachments/20140904/c94ff8cd/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: after.png
Type: image/png
Size: 8848 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/piglit/attachments/20140904/c94ff8cd/attachment-0001.png>

More information about the Piglit mailing list