[Piglit] [PATCH] README: add a note about the test counts

[Dylan Baker]

On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 5:32 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 01:55:05PM -0700, Dylan Baker wrote:
> > It's worth noting that piglit run and piglit summary count tests
> > differently.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dylan Baker <dylanx.c.baker at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  README | 9 +++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/README b/README
> > index 773a350..8381ff4 100644
> > --- a/README
> > +++ b/README
> > @@ -274,6 +274,15 @@ The summary shows the 'status' of a test:
> >  There are also dmesg-* statuses. These have the same meaning as above,
> but are
> >  triggered by dmesg related messages.
> >
> > +3.1 Note
> > +--------
> > +
> > +The way 'piglit run' and 'piglit summary' count tests are different,
> 'piglit
> > +run' counts the number of Test derived instance in the profile(s)
> selected,
> > +while 'piglit summary' counts the number of subtests a result contains,
> or it's
> > +result if there are no subtests. This means that the number shown by
> 'piglit
> > +run' and the total as calculated by 'piglit summary' may not match.
>
> Isn't it piglit run <= piglit summary and never a smaller number in piglit
> summary than in piglit run? Might be good to clarify that, otherwise lgtm.
> -Daniel
>

Yes, you are correct. I'll change that.


>
> > +
> >
> >  4. Available test sets
> >  ----------------------
> > --
> > 2.5.0
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Piglit mailing list
> > Piglit at lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/piglit/attachments/20150825/27c5a650/attachment.html>