[Piglit] [PATCH] Ignore piglit warning status in JUnit

Dylan Baker baker.dylan.c at gmail.com
Fri Jun 26 11:54:04 PDT 2015

> > Yes.  I used the comment in framework/status.py to determine what
> > severities of piglit status correspond to JUnit failures:
> >
> >     Status ordering from best to worst:
> >
> >     pass
> >     dmesg-warn
> >     warn
> >     dmesg-fail
> >     fail
> >     timeout
> >     crash
> Pretty sure that dmesg-warn is worse than warn, and quite sure that
> dmesg-fail is worse than fail. I think that comment is out of date.
> Dylan?

Yeah, I agree with Ilia, I think dmesg-<status> should be worse than
<status>. And looking at the code the comment is wrong, I've pushed a
trivial patch to update that comment to reflect the actual code.

Sorry for the confusion.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/piglit/attachments/20150626/18bdca7b/attachment.sig>

More information about the Piglit mailing list