[Piglit] [PATCH 1/2] arb_program_interface_query: GetProgramResourceIndex test

Tapani Pälli tapani.palli at intel.com
Sun Mar 1 21:42:36 PST 2015



On 02/27/2015 06:04 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Tapani Pälli <tapani.palli at intel.com> wrote:
>> Test passes on Nvidia GTX 660 (binary driver version 331.38).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tapani Pälli <tapani.palli at intel.com>
>> ---
>>   tests/all.py                                       |   1 +
>>   .../arb_program_interface_query/CMakeLists.gl.txt  |   1 +
>>   .../arb_program_interface_query/resource-index.c   | 210 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>   3 files changed, 212 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 tests/spec/arb_program_interface_query/resource-index.c
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/all.py b/tests/all.py
>> index 8b9426a..d19b20a 100644
>> --- a/tests/all.py
>> +++ b/tests/all.py
>> @@ -2049,6 +2049,7 @@ for test_type in ('shader', 'api'):
>>
>>   arb_program_interface_query = spec['ARB_program_interface_query']
>>   add_plain_test(arb_program_interface_query, ['arb_program_interface_query-resource-location'])
>> +add_plain_test(arb_program_interface_query, ['arb_program_interface_query-resource-index'])
>>
>>   # Group ARB_explicit_uniform_location
>>   arb_explicit_uniform_location = spec['ARB_explicit_uniform_location']
>> diff --git a/tests/spec/arb_program_interface_query/CMakeLists.gl.txt b/tests/spec/arb_program_interface_query/CMakeLists.gl.txt
>> index 6fb7eaf..2028553 100644
>> --- a/tests/spec/arb_program_interface_query/CMakeLists.gl.txt
>> +++ b/tests/spec/arb_program_interface_query/CMakeLists.gl.txt
>> @@ -10,3 +10,4 @@ link_libraries (
>>   )
>>
>>   piglit_add_executable (arb_program_interface_query-resource-location resource-location.c)
>> +piglit_add_executable (arb_program_interface_query-resource-index resource-index.c)
>> diff --git a/tests/spec/arb_program_interface_query/resource-index.c b/tests/spec/arb_program_interface_query/resource-index.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..a496c65
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tests/spec/arb_program_interface_query/resource-index.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,210 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright © 2015 Intel Corporation
>> + *
>> + * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
>> + * copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
>> + * to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
>> + * the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense,
>> + * and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
>> + * Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
>> + *
>> + * The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including the next
>> + * paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the
>> + * Software.
>> + *
>> + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
>> + * IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
>> + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.  IN NO EVENT SHALL
>> + * THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
>> + * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
>> + * FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS
>> + * IN THE SOFTWARE.
>> + */
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * \file resource-index.c
>> + *
>> + * Tests GetProgramResourceIndex interface.
>> + *
>> + * From the GL_ARB_program_interface_query spec:
>> + *     "The command returns the unsigned integer index assigned to a
>> + *     resource named <name> in the interface type <programInterface> of
>> + *     program object <program>.  The error INVALID_ENUM is generated if
>> + *     <programInterface> is ATOMIC_COUNTER_BUFFER, since active atomic
>> + *     counter buffer resources are not assigned name strings.
>> + *
>> + *     If <name> exactly matches the name string of one of the active
>> + *     resources for <programInterface>, the index of the matched
>> + *     resource is returned. Additionally, if <name> would exactly match
>> + *     the name string of an active resource if "[0]" were appended to <name>,
>> + *     the index of the matched resource is returned.  Otherwise, <name> is
>> + *     considered not to be the name of an active resource, and INVALID_INDEX
>> + *     is returned.  Note that if an interface enumerates a single active
>> + *     resource list entry for an array variable (e.g., "a[0]"), a <name>
>> + *     identifying any array element other than the first (e.g., "a[1]")
>> + *     is not considered to match.
>> + *
>> + *     For the interface TRANSFORM_FEEDBACK_VARYING, the value INVALID_INDEX
>> + *     should be returned when querying the index assigned to the special
>> + *     names "gl_NextBuffer", "gl_SkipComponents1", "gl_SkipComponents2",
>> + *     "gl_SkipComponents3", and "gl_SkipComponents4".
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include "piglit-util-gl.h"
>> +
>> +PIGLIT_GL_TEST_CONFIG_BEGIN
>> +
>> +       config.supports_gl_compat_version = 32;
>> +       config.supports_gl_core_version = 32;
>
> You should really have just one of these... I think the compat one can go.

ok

>> +       config.window_visual = PIGLIT_GL_VISUAL_RGB;
>> +
>> +PIGLIT_GL_TEST_CONFIG_END
>> +
>
> [...]
>
>> +
>> +void
>> +piglit_init(int argc, char **argv)
>> +{
>> +       GLuint prog, shader;
>> +       bool pass = true;
>> +       const char **marker = xfb_markers;
>> +
>> +       piglit_require_extension("GL_ARB_program_interface_query");
>> +       piglit_require_extension("GL_ARB_explicit_attrib_location");
>> +       piglit_require_extension("GL_ARB_explicit_uniform_location");
>> +       piglit_require_extension("GL_ARB_shader_atomic_counters");
>
> Ouch. Only i965 supports shader_atomic_counters right now... and
> there's no reason the extension can't be enabled on drivers that don't
> and/or never will support shader_atomic_counters -- can you make these
> conditional for their relevant subtests? i.e. if
> (piglit_is_extension_supported()) ... And you can similarly have
> #ifdefs in the shader code. [atomic counters is the only one I'm
> worried about, so if the other two are a pain to conditionalize, I
> wouldn't really care.]

Yes, no problem. I will make it a conditional subtest.

>> +
>> +       /* Test invalid program. */
>> +       glGetProgramResourceIndex(42, GL_UNIFORM, "name");
>> +       if (!piglit_check_gl_error(GL_INVALID_VALUE)) {
>> +               piglit_report_subtest_result(PIGLIT_FAIL,
>> +                       "invalid program test 1");
>> +               pass = false;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       /* Test passing a shader, not program. */
>> +       shader = piglit_compile_shader_text(GL_VERTEX_SHADER, vs_text);
>> +       glGetProgramResourceIndex(shader, GL_UNIFORM, "name");
>> +       if (!piglit_check_gl_error(GL_INVALID_OPERATION)) {
>> +               piglit_report_subtest_result(PIGLIT_FAIL,
>> +                       "invalid program test 2");
>> +               pass = false;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       prog = piglit_build_simple_program(vs_text, fs_text);
>> +
>> +       if (!piglit_check_gl_error(GL_NO_ERROR))
>> +               piglit_report_result(PIGLIT_FAIL);
>> +
>> +       /* Iterate transform feedback marker strings. */
>> +       for (; *marker; marker++) {
>> +               GLuint index = glGetProgramResourceIndex(prog,
>> +                       GL_TRANSFORM_FEEDBACK_VARYING, *marker);
>> +               if (index == GL_INVALID_INDEX)
>> +                       continue;
>> +               piglit_report_subtest_result(PIGLIT_FAIL,
>> +                       "xfb marker string test (%s)", *marker);
>> +               pass = false;
>> +        }
>> +
>> +       /* Test GL_ATOMIC_COUNTER_BUFFER. */
>> +       glGetProgramResourceIndex(prog, GL_ATOMIC_COUNTER_BUFFER, "atom");
>> +       if (!piglit_check_gl_error(GL_INVALID_ENUM))
>> +               piglit_report_result(PIGLIT_FAIL);
>> +
>> +       /* Check valid but missing program resource. */
>> +       if (glGetProgramResourceIndex(prog, GL_TRANSFORM_FEEDBACK_VARYING,
>> +               "sandwich") != GL_INVALID_INDEX)
>> +               piglit_report_result(PIGLIT_FAIL);
>> +
>> +       /* Check invalid index with array resource (> 0) */
>> +       if (glGetProgramResourceIndex(prog, GL_UNIFORM, "array[7]") !=
>> +               GL_INVALID_INDEX)
>> +               piglit_report_result(PIGLIT_FAIL);
>> +
>> +       /* Valid inputs. */
>> +       validate_index(prog, GL_PROGRAM_INPUT,  "input0");
>> +       validate_index(prog, GL_PROGRAM_INPUT,  "input1");
>> +       validate_index(prog, GL_PROGRAM_OUTPUT, "gl_Position");
>> +       validate_index(prog, GL_PROGRAM_OUTPUT, "output0");
>> +       validate_index(prog, GL_PROGRAM_OUTPUT, "output1");
>> +       validate_index(prog, GL_UNIFORM, "color");
>> +       validate_index(prog, GL_UNIFORM_BLOCK, "ubo");
>> +       validate_index(prog, GL_UNIFORM, "array");
>> +       validate_index(prog, GL_UNIFORM, "array[0]");
>> +
>> +       if (!piglit_check_gl_error(GL_NO_ERROR))
>> +               piglit_report_result(PIGLIT_FAIL);
>> +
>> +       piglit_report_result(pass ? PIGLIT_PASS : PIGLIT_FAIL);
>> +}
>> --
>> 2.1.0
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Piglit mailing list
>> Piglit at lists.freedesktop.org
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit


More information about the Piglit mailing list