[Piglit] [PATCH] dsa: avoid stencil8 in gettextureimage-formats

[Brian Paul]

On 05/22/2015 06:37 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> This causes an assert failure in mesa and it doesn't seem like this test
> is designed for depth/stencil formats.

If we've got a piglit test that triggers a Mesa assertion, it means 
there's probably a Mesa bug too, right?

-Brian


>
> Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu>
> ---
>
> Ian, I know you're rewriting half these tests... feel free to fold this
> into your series if you like.
>
>   tests/spec/arb_direct_state_access/gettextureimage-formats.c | 3 ++-
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/spec/arb_direct_state_access/gettextureimage-formats.c b/tests/spec/arb_direct_state_access/gettextureimage-formats.c
> index e2d637c..ce25205 100644
> --- a/tests/spec/arb_direct_state_access/gettextureimage-formats.c
> +++ b/tests/spec/arb_direct_state_access/gettextureimage-formats.c
> @@ -462,7 +462,8 @@ supported_format_set(const struct test_desc *set)
>   		 set->format == ext_packed_depth_stencil ||
>   		 set->format == arb_texture_rg_int ||
>   		 set->format == arb_depth_texture ||
> -		 set->format == arb_depth_buffer_float) {
> +		 set->format == arb_depth_buffer_float ||
> +		 set->format == arb_texture_stencil8) {
>   		/*
>   		 * texture_integer requires a fragment shader, different
>   		 * glTexImage calls.  Depth/stencil formats not implemented.
>