[Piglit] [PATCH] glsl-es: Test whether or not sequence can be a constant expression

[Matt Turner]

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Ian Romanick <idr at freedesktop.org> wrote:
> From: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick at intel.com>
>
> The rules changed from GLSL ES 1.00 to GLSL ES 3.00, so the two tests
> expect opposite results.
>
> NOTE: Mesa currently fails
> tests/spec/glsl-es-3.00/compiler/constant-sequence.vert and the related
> GLES3 conformance test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick at intel.com>
> Cc: Tapani Pälli <tapani.palli at intel.com>
> Cc: Mark Janes <mark.a.janes at intel.com>
> Cc: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofstedt at intel.com>
> ---
>  .../glsl-es-1.00/compiler/constant-sequence.vert    | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  .../glsl-es-3.00/compiler/constant-sequence.vert    | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 38 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 tests/spec/glsl-es-1.00/compiler/constant-sequence.vert
>  create mode 100644 tests/spec/glsl-es-3.00/compiler/constant-sequence.vert
>
> diff --git a/tests/spec/glsl-es-1.00/compiler/constant-sequence.vert b/tests/spec/glsl-es-1.00/compiler/constant-sequence.vert
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..f57707b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/spec/glsl-es-1.00/compiler/constant-sequence.vert
> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> +#version 100
> +
> +/* [config]
> + * expect_result: pass
> + * glsl_version: 1.00
> + * [end config]
> + *
> + * While the sequnece operator is specifically disallowed as a constant
> + * expression in GLSL ES 3.0 and later, it is allowed in GLSL ES 1.00.

Yay! More pointless differences that don't actually save anyone any
work since your compiler has to accept both #versions!

Also typo: sequence