[Piglit] [PATCH 4/4] arb_shader_atomic_counters/max-counters: Run the combined atomic buffer test in more cases.
Timothy Arceri
t_arceri at yahoo.com.au
Wed Sep 30 14:18:46 PDT 2015
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 20:53 +0300, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> The subtest with at most the maximum number of atomic counter buffers
> can be run whenever the combined limit is at least one more than the
> limit for the FS stage. The subtest exceeding the maximum number of
> combined atomic counter buffers can be run whenever the sum of the
> limits for the VS and FS stages is greater than the combined limit.
This patch looks correct however above this code there is what looks
like a duplicate test:
if (ls.vertex_counters + ls.fragment_counters >
ls.combined_counters) {
atomic_counters_subtest(&status, GL_NONE,
"Combined test above maximum
number "
"of atomic counters",
!run_test_combined_max_counters,
ls.fragment_counters,
ls.combined_counters
- ls.fragment_counters + 1);
} else {
piglit_report_subtest_result(
PIGLIT_SKIP, "Combined test above maximum
number "
"of atomic counters");
}
If you agree this is a duplicate and remove it to then:
Reviewed-by: Timothy Arceri <t_arceri at yahoo.com.au>
> ---
> .../spec/arb_shader_atomic_counters/max-counters.c | 22 ++++++++++++
> ----------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/spec/arb_shader_atomic_counters/max-counters.c
> b/tests/spec/arb_shader_atomic_counters/max-counters.c
> index 7014c7b..8209f0d 100644
> --- a/tests/spec/arb_shader_atomic_counters/max-counters.c
> +++ b/tests/spec/arb_shader_atomic_counters/max-counters.c
> @@ -441,29 +441,31 @@ piglit_init(int argc, char **argv)
> !run_test_vertex_max_buffers,
> ls.vertex_buffers + 1);
>
> - if (ls.vertex_buffers + ls.fragment_buffers >
> ls.combined_buffers) {
> - int max_safe_vs = MIN2(ls.vertex_buffers,
> - ls.combined_buffers -
> - ls.fragment_buffers);
> + const int combined_test_max_vs_bufs =
> + MIN2(ls.vertex_buffers, ls.combined_buffers -
> ls.fragment_buffers);
> +
> + if (combined_test_max_vs_bufs > 0) {
> atomic_counters_subtest(&status, GL_NONE,
> "Combined test under maximum
> "
> "number of atomic counter
> buffers",
>
> run_test_combined_max_buffers,
> ls.fragment_buffers,
> - max_safe_vs);
> + combined_test_max_vs_bufs);
> + } else {
> + piglit_report_subtest_result(
> + PIGLIT_SKIP, "Combined test under maximum "
> + "number of atomic counter buffers");
> + }
>
> + if (combined_test_max_vs_bufs < ls.vertex_buffers) {
> atomic_counters_subtest(&status, GL_NONE,
> "Combined test above maximum
> "
> "number of atomic counter
> buffers",
>
> !run_test_combined_max_buffers,
> ls.fragment_buffers,
> - max_safe_vs + 1);
> -
> + combined_test_max_vs_bufs +
> 1);
> } else {
> piglit_report_subtest_result(
> - PIGLIT_SKIP, "Combined test under maximum "
> - "number of atomic counter buffers");
> - piglit_report_subtest_result(
> PIGLIT_SKIP, "Combined test above maximum "
> "number of atomic counter buffers");
> }
More information about the Piglit
mailing list