[Piglit] [RFC] Trying to fix dmabuf/yuv tests
Kristian Høgsberg
hoegsberg at gmail.com
Tue Sep 6 20:53:01 UTC 2016
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Rob Clark <robdclark at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Rob Clark <robdclark at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> @@ -212,28 +247,65 @@ piglit_gbm_buf_create(unsigned w, unsigned h, unsigned cpp,
>>>> void *dst_data;
>>>> void *map_data = NULL;
>>>> enum gbm_bo_format format;
>>>> + unsigned cpp = 0, src_stride;
>>>> + unsigned buf_w = w;
>>>> + unsigned buf_h = h;
>>>>
>>>> - if (!gbm || h % 2)
>>>> + if (!gbm || h % 2 || w % 2)
>>>> return false;
>>>>
>>>> - /* It would be nice if we took in a fourcc instead of a cpp */
>>>> - switch (cpp) {
>>>
>>> Can we just switch over to always taking a fourcc? This cpp_or_fourcc is messy.
>>
>> I think it made a bit more sense when I started (and thought that this
>> would be a smaller patch) to avoid extra churn..
>>
>> Maybe in the end since you have the U/V interleaved by row, we might
>> not end up needing my patch. But otherwise, at this point it wouldn't
>> make the patch that much larger to fix up the handful of rgb tests
>
>
> oh, no, spoke too soon, we still have an issue for UV plane when hw
> has alignment restriction in pixels instead of bytes..
We can just rearrange the input data for the yuv test to not be laid
out like that. There was no specific reason that I did it that way.
Kristian
More information about the Piglit
mailing list