[Piglit] [PATCH 2/2] dmabuf: fix small typo in error message

[Rob Clark]

On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Rob Clark <robdclark at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark at gmail.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric at anholt.net>
>> ---
>>  tests/util/piglit-framework-gl/piglit_drm_dma_buf.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/util/piglit-framework-gl/piglit_drm_dma_buf.c b/tests/util/piglit-framework-gl/piglit_drm_dma_buf.c
>> index c3225c3..8e87b25 100644
>> --- a/tests/util/piglit-framework-gl/piglit_drm_dma_buf.c
>> +++ b/tests/util/piglit-framework-gl/piglit_drm_dma_buf.c
>> @@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ piglit_drm_get_driver(void)
>>         if (drv.fd == -1) {
>>                 drv.fd = open("/dev/dri/card0", O_RDWR);
>>                 if (drv.fd == -1) {
>> -                       fprintf(stderr, "error: failed to open /dev/dri/renderD128 and "
>> +                       fprintf(stderr, "error: failed to open /dev/dri/renderD128 or "
>>                                 "/dev/dri/card0\n");
>
> Is it or? Looks like and to me...

as mentioned on IRC, the point was to convey that either render or
card node is required..  (although, for multi-gpu we probably should
be using drmOpen() or something??)

maybe "failed to open A and B (requires either)"?

BR,
-R

>>                         goto fail;
>>
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Piglit mailing list
>> Piglit at lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit