[Piglit] Status of Glean test rewrites?

[Dylan Baker]

Quoting Timothy Arceri (2017-06-14 18:17:19)
> On 15/06/17 10:57, Dylan Baker wrote:
> > I have (a now fairly old) series to port either the arb fp or vp tests to
> > shader_runner on the list. I have no idea how much work they'd need to land, or
> > if they're really relavent.
> > 
> > Ian had patches (I have no idea how far done) to generate arb_fp and arb_vp
> > tests which would superscede both glean and my work. I don't think those patches
> > ever went to the list or how much work was remaining.
> 
> They seem mostly ok, and I'd been keen to land them but there are 
> comments about changing the input/output values that were never addressed.

I think I mostly got side tracked with other things. I'll have a look back
through the comments and see about re-spinning when I have a chance.

> 
> Was there any reason for not sending a new series? As far as I can see 
> it shouldn't be too much work to get these commit worthy.
> 
> 
> > 
> > Dylan
> > 
> > Quoting Timothy Arceri (2017-06-14 17:48:24)
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> I recently got a cpu with more than 2 cores \o/ and it's become even
> >> more obvious just how much of a bottle neck the glean tests are.
> >>
> >> Anyway what is the currently status of the rewrite? Have all the current
> >> patches landed or are there still patchs waiting review/yet to be finished?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Tim
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Piglit mailing list
> >> Piglit at lists.freedesktop.org
> >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/piglit/attachments/20170614/be83dac8/attachment.sig>