[Piglit] [PATCH 5/5] egl: add eglCopyBuffers test

[Emil Velikov]

On 21 December 2017 at 09:26, Tapani Pälli <tapani.palli at intel.com> wrote:
>
> On 12/18/2017 04:37 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>
>> On 13 December 2017 at 12:54, Tapani Pälli <tapani.palli at intel.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> The test doesn't care how well eglCopyBuffers itself works - aim it to
>>>> illustrate the buggy validation in Mesa.
>>>> Hence the wait + pixmap readback are not really needed.
>>>>
>>>> Admittedly the test name is quite misleading as-is - I'm short on
>>>> alternatives though :-(
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> OK, yeah that is fine. It's not far from 'complete test' though but such
>>> athing can be also added later.
>>>
>> Agreed. Would you have any additional suggestions on this patch?
>> Input on the nitpicks (originally put by yours truly) would be
>> appreciated:
>>
>>   - suggestions for test name and category?
>
>
> I guess "tests/bugs" is for this kind of specific misc issues but I think
> egl and copybuffers is fine assuming it can be expanded later with the pixel
> reading and then name shouldn't be an issue.
>
>>   - should we bother at all with piglit_egl_get_default_display(EGL_NONE)
>
>
> No opinion here
>
>>   - yay X11+DRI3 crashes somewhere in the xshmfence code... DRI2 works
>> fine.
>>
>
> This would be good to figure out .. I cannot spot why it would happen though
> :/
>
Tapani, others,

Anyone care to share a r-b on this patch?

Thanks
Emil