[Piglit] [PATCH] arb_gpu_shader_int64: Test extracting individual bytes from 64-bit values
Ian Romanick
idr at freedesktop.org
Thu Feb 28 17:31:23 UTC 2019
From: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick at intel.com>
In Mesa, NIR has an optimization that will convert certain patterns into
instructions that extract an individual byte from a larger integer.
When extracting from a 64-bit value, the i965 compiler backend has some
bugs emitting these instructions. These tests try to reproduce these
problems, but only fs-ushr-and-mask.shader_test is able to trigger the
failure.
The optimization is not (yet) able to recognize the patterns from the
other tests to generate the mishandled instructions. With those
patterns added, all of these tests either fail or hit the assertion:
src/intel/compiler/brw_ir_fs.h:295: fs_reg subscript(fs_reg, brw_reg_type, unsigned int): Assertion `(i + 1) * type_sz(type) <= type_sz(reg.type)' failed.
Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88 at gmail.com>
Cc: Jason Ekstrand <jason at jlekstrand.net>
---
.../execution/fs-ishl-then-ishr-loop.shader_test | 55 +++++++++++++
.../execution/fs-ishl-then-ishr.shader_test | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++
.../execution/fs-ishl-then-ushr-loop.shader_test | 55 +++++++++++++
.../execution/fs-ishl-then-ushr.shader_test | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++
.../execution/fs-ishr-and-mask-loop.shader_test | 55 +++++++++++++
.../execution/fs-ishr-and-mask.shader_test | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++
.../execution/fs-ushr-and-mask-loop.shader_test | 56 ++++++++++++++
.../execution/fs-ushr-and-mask.shader_test | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++
8 files changed, 577 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tests/spec/arb_gpu_shader_int64/execution/fs-ishl-then-ishr-loop.shader_test
create mode 100644 tests/spec/arb_gpu_shader_int64/execution/fs-ishl-then-ishr.shader_test
create mode 100644 tests/spec/arb_gpu_shader_int64/execution/fs-ishl-then-ushr-loop.shader_test
create mode 100644 tests/spec/arb_gpu_shader_int64/execution/fs-ishl-then-ushr.shader_test
create mode 100644 tests/spec/arb_gpu_shader_int64/execution/fs-ishr-and-mask-loop.shader_test
create mode 100644 tests/spec/arb_gpu_shader_int64/execution/fs-ishr-and-mask.shader_test
create mode 100644 tests/spec/arb_gpu_shader_int64/execution/fs-ushr-and-mask-loop.shader_test
create mode 100644 tests/spec/arb_gpu_shader_int64/execution/fs-ushr-and-mask.shader_test
diff --git a/tests/spec/arb_gpu_shader_int64/execution/fs-ishl-then-ishr-loop.shader_test b/tests/spec/arb_gpu_shader_int64/execution/fs-ishl-then-ishr-loop.shader_test
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..4eacc615b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/spec/arb_gpu_shader_int64/execution/fs-ishl-then-ishr-loop.shader_test
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+[require]
+GL >= 4.0
+GLSL >= 4.00
+GL_ARB_gpu_shader_int64
+
+[vertex shader passthrough]
+
+[fragment shader]
+#version 400
+#extension GL_ARB_gpu_shader_int64 : require
+
+uniform int64_t ival[] = int64_t[](0xBADDC0DEDEADBEEFl,
+ 0xDEADBEA7BA5EBA11l,
+ 0xF0F1F2F3F4F5F6F7l,
+ 0x0F1F2F3F4F5F6F7Fl,
+ 0x7071727374757677l,
+ 0x0717273747576777l,
+ 0x1F2E3D4C5B6A7988l,
+ 0xBADB100DDEADC0DEl);
+
+const int64_t expected[] = int64_t[](0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFEFl,
+ 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFBAl,
+ 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF5l,
+ 0x000000000000004Fl,
+ 0x0000000000000073l,
+ 0x0000000000000027l,
+ 0x000000000000002El,
+ 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFBAl);
+
+out vec4 piglit_fragcolor;
+
+void main()
+{
+ uint fail_mask = 0;
+
+ for (uint i = 0; i < uint(ival.length()); i++) {
+ uint64_t result = (ival[i] << (56u - (i * 8u))) >> 56u;
+ fail_mask |= result != expected[i] ? 1u << i : 0u;
+ }
+
+ /* Construct a clever color so that just looking at the "Observed:"
+ * output from shader_runner will tell you exactly which values did
+ * not match.
+ */
+ piglit_fragcolor = fail_mask == 0
+ ? vec4(0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 1.0)
+ : vec4(float(fail_mask) / 255.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0);
+}
+
+[test]
+clear color 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
+clear
+
+draw rect -1 -1 2 2
+probe all rgba 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0
diff --git a/tests/spec/arb_gpu_shader_int64/execution/fs-ishl-then-ishr.shader_test b/tests/spec/arb_gpu_shader_int64/execution/fs-ishl-then-ishr.shader_test
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..f6a6ba542
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/spec/arb_gpu_shader_int64/execution/fs-ishl-then-ishr.shader_test
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+[require]
+GL >= 4.0
+GLSL >= 4.00
+GL_ARB_gpu_shader_int64
+
+[vertex shader passthrough]
+
+[fragment shader]
+#version 400
+#extension GL_ARB_gpu_shader_int64 : require
+
+uniform int64_t ival[] = int64_t[](0xBADDC0DEDEADBEEFl,
+ 0xDEADBEA7BA5EBA11l,
+ 0xF0F1F2F3F4F5F6F7l,
+ 0x0F1F2F3F4F5F6F7Fl,
+ 0x7071727374757677l,
+ 0x0717273747576777l,
+ 0x1F2E3D4C5B6A7988l,
+ 0xBADB100DDEADC0DEl);
+
+const int64_t expected[] = int64_t[](0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFEFl,
+ 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFBAl,
+ 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF5l,
+ 0x000000000000004Fl,
+ 0x0000000000000073l,
+ 0x0000000000000027l,
+ 0x000000000000002El,
+ 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFBAl);
+
+out vec4 piglit_fragcolor;
+
+void main()
+{
+ uint fail_mask = 0;
+ uint64_t result;
+ uint i;
+
+ /* This is INTENTIONALLY not a loop. Putting it in a loop causes the
+ * optimization that generates the extract instructions to trigger
+ * before the shift count is known to be a constant. The effectively
+ * prevents the bad code generation in the i965 driver from occuring.
+ */
+ i = 0;
+ result = (ival[i] << (56u - (i * 8u))) >> 56u;
+ fail_mask |= result != expected[i] ? 1u << i : 0u;
+
+ i = 1;
+ result = (ival[i] << (56u - (i * 8u))) >> 56u;
+ fail_mask |= result != expected[i] ? 1u << i : 0u;
+
+ i = 2;
+ result = (ival[i] << (56u - (i * 8u))) >> 56u;
+ fail_mask |= result != expected[i] ? 1u << i : 0u;
+
+ i = 3;
+ result = (ival[i] << (56u - (i * 8u))) >> 56u;
+ fail_mask |= result != expected[i] ? 1u << i : 0u;
+
+ i = 4;
+ result = (ival[i] << (56u - (i * 8u))) >> 56u;
+ fail_mask |= result != expected[i] ? 1u << i : 0u;
+
+ i = 5;
+ result = (ival[i] << (56u - (i * 8u))) >> 56u;
+ fail_mask |= result != expected[i] ? 1u << i : 0u;
+
+ i = 6;
+ result = (ival[i] << (56u - (i * 8u))) >> 56u;
+ fail_mask |= result != expected[i] ? 1u << i : 0u;
+
+ i = 7;
+ result = (ival[i] << (56u - (i * 8u))) >> 56u;
+ fail_mask |= result != expected[i] ? 1u << i : 0u;
+
+ /* Construct a clever color so that just looking at the "Observed:"
+ * output from shader_runner will tell you exactly which values did
+ * not match.
+ */
+ piglit_fragcolor = fail_mask == 0
+ ? vec4(0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 1.0)
+ : vec4(float(fail_mask) / 255.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0);
+}
+
+[test]
+clear color 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
+clear
+
+draw rect -1 -1 2 2
+probe all rgba 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0
diff --git a/tests/spec/arb_gpu_shader_int64/execution/fs-ishl-then-ushr-loop.shader_test b/tests/spec/arb_gpu_shader_int64/execution/fs-ishl-then-ushr-loop.shader_test
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..197876ab7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/spec/arb_gpu_shader_int64/execution/fs-ishl-then-ushr-loop.shader_test
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+[require]
+GL >= 4.0
+GLSL >= 4.00
+GL_ARB_gpu_shader_int64
+
+[vertex shader passthrough]
+
+[fragment shader]
+#version 400
+#extension GL_ARB_gpu_shader_int64 : require
+
+uniform uint64_t ival[] = uint64_t[](0xBADDC0DEDEADBEEFul,
+ 0xDEADBEA7BA5EBA11ul,
+ 0xF0F1F2F3F4F5F6F7ul,
+ 0x0F1F2F3F4F5F6F7Ful,
+ 0x7071727374757677ul,
+ 0x0717273747576777ul,
+ 0x1F2E3D4C5B6A7988ul,
+ 0xBADB100DDEADC0DEul);
+
+const uint64_t expected[] = uint64_t[](0x00000000000000EFul,
+ 0x00000000000000BAul,
+ 0x00000000000000F5ul,
+ 0x000000000000004Ful,
+ 0x0000000000000073ul,
+ 0x0000000000000027ul,
+ 0x000000000000002Eul,
+ 0x00000000000000BAul);
+
+out vec4 piglit_fragcolor;
+
+void main()
+{
+ uint fail_mask = 0;
+
+ for (uint i = 0; i < uint(ival.length()); i++) {
+ uint64_t result = (ival[i] << (56u - (i * 8u))) >> 56u;
+ fail_mask |= result != expected[i] ? 1u << i : 0u;
+ }
+
+ /* Construct a clever color so that just looking at the "Observed:"
+ * output from shader_runner will tell you exactly which values did
+ * not match.
+ */
+ piglit_fragcolor = fail_mask == 0
+ ? vec4(0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 1.0)
+ : vec4(float(fail_mask) / 255.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0);
+}
+
+[test]
+clear color 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
+clear
+
+draw rect -1 -1 2 2
+probe all rgba 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0
diff --git a/tests/spec/arb_gpu_shader_int64/execution/fs-ishl-then-ushr.shader_test b/tests/spec/arb_gpu_shader_int64/execution/fs-ishl-then-ushr.shader_test
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..30844ea0b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/spec/arb_gpu_shader_int64/execution/fs-ishl-then-ushr.shader_test
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+[require]
+GL >= 4.0
+GLSL >= 4.00
+GL_ARB_gpu_shader_int64
+
+[vertex shader passthrough]
+
+[fragment shader]
+#version 400
+#extension GL_ARB_gpu_shader_int64 : require
+
+uniform uint64_t ival[] = uint64_t[](0xBADDC0DEDEADBEEFul,
+ 0xDEADBEA7BA5EBA11ul,
+ 0xF0F1F2F3F4F5F6F7ul,
+ 0x0F1F2F3F4F5F6F7Ful,
+ 0x7071727374757677ul,
+ 0x0717273747576777ul,
+ 0x1F2E3D4C5B6A7988ul,
+ 0xBADB100DDEADC0DEul);
+
+const uint64_t expected[] = uint64_t[](0x00000000000000EFul,
+ 0x00000000000000BAul,
+ 0x00000000000000F5ul,
+ 0x000000000000004Ful,
+ 0x0000000000000073ul,
+ 0x0000000000000027ul,
+ 0x000000000000002Eul,
+ 0x00000000000000BAul);
+
+out vec4 piglit_fragcolor;
+
+void main()
+{
+ uint fail_mask = 0;
+ uint64_t result;
+ uint i;
+
+ /* This is INTENTIONALLY not a loop. Putting it in a loop causes the
+ * optimization that generates the extract instructions to trigger
+ * before the shift count is known to be a constant. The effectively
+ * prevents the bad code generation in the i965 driver from occuring.
+ */
+ i = 0;
+ result = (ival[i] << (56u - (i * 8u))) >> 56u;
+ fail_mask |= result != expected[i] ? 1u << i : 0u;
+
+ i = 1;
+ result = (ival[i] << (56u - (i * 8u))) >> 56u;
+ fail_mask |= result != expected[i] ? 1u << i : 0u;
+
+ i = 2;
+ result = (ival[i] << (56u - (i * 8u))) >> 56u;
+ fail_mask |= result != expected[i] ? 1u << i : 0u;
+
+ i = 3;
+ result = (ival[i] << (56u - (i * 8u))) >> 56u;
+ fail_mask |= result != expected[i] ? 1u << i : 0u;
+
+ i = 4;
+ result = (ival[i] << (56u - (i * 8u))) >> 56u;
+ fail_mask |= result != expected[i] ? 1u << i : 0u;
+
+ i = 5;
+ result = (ival[i] << (56u - (i * 8u))) >> 56u;
+ fail_mask |= result != expected[i] ? 1u << i : 0u;
+
+ i = 6;
+ result = (ival[i] << (56u - (i * 8u))) >> 56u;
+ fail_mask |= result != expected[i] ? 1u << i : 0u;
+
+ i = 7;
+ result = (ival[i] << (56u - (i * 8u))) >> 56u;
+ fail_mask |= result != expected[i] ? 1u << i : 0u;
+
+ /* Construct a clever color so that just looking at the "Observed:"
+ * output from shader_runner will tell you exactly which values did
+ * not match.
+ */
+ piglit_fragcolor = fail_mask == 0
+ ? vec4(0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 1.0)
+ : vec4(float(fail_mask) / 255.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0);
+}
+
+[test]
+clear color 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
+clear
+
+draw rect -1 -1 2 2
+probe all rgba 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0
diff --git a/tests/spec/arb_gpu_shader_int64/execution/fs-ishr-and-mask-loop.shader_test b/tests/spec/arb_gpu_shader_int64/execution/fs-ishr-and-mask-loop.shader_test
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..a5cec5d0e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/spec/arb_gpu_shader_int64/execution/fs-ishr-and-mask-loop.shader_test
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+[require]
+GL >= 4.0
+GLSL >= 4.00
+GL_ARB_gpu_shader_int64
+
+[vertex shader passthrough]
+
+[fragment shader]
+#version 400
+#extension GL_ARB_gpu_shader_int64 : require
+
+uniform int64_t ival[] = int64_t[](0xBADDC0DEDEADBEEFl,
+ 0xDEADBEA7BA5EBA11l,
+ 0xF0F1F2F3F4F5F6F7l,
+ 0x0F1F2F3F4F5F6F7Fl,
+ 0x7071727374757677l,
+ 0x0717273747576777l,
+ 0x1F2E3D4C5B6A7988l,
+ 0xBADB100DDEADC0DEl);
+
+const int64_t expected[] = int64_t[](0x00000000000000EFl,
+ 0x00000000000000BAl,
+ 0x00000000000000F5l,
+ 0x000000000000004Fl,
+ 0x0000000000000073l,
+ 0x0000000000000027l,
+ 0x000000000000002El,
+ 0x00000000000000BAl);
+
+out vec4 piglit_fragcolor;
+
+void main()
+{
+ uint fail_mask = 0;
+
+ for (uint i = 0; i < uint(ival.length()); i++) {
+ uint64_t result = (ival[i] >> (i * 8u)) & 0x0FFl;
+ fail_mask |= result != expected[i] ? 1u << i : 0u;
+ }
+
+ /* Construct a clever color so that just looking at the "Observed:"
+ * output from shader_runner will tell you exactly which values did
+ * not match.
+ */
+ piglit_fragcolor = fail_mask == 0
+ ? vec4(0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 1.0)
+ : vec4(float(fail_mask) / 255.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0);
+}
+
+[test]
+clear color 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
+clear
+
+draw rect -1 -1 2 2
+probe all rgba 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0
diff --git a/tests/spec/arb_gpu_shader_int64/execution/fs-ishr-and-mask.shader_test b/tests/spec/arb_gpu_shader_int64/execution/fs-ishr-and-mask.shader_test
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..fa1509dfa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/spec/arb_gpu_shader_int64/execution/fs-ishr-and-mask.shader_test
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+[require]
+GL >= 4.0
+GLSL >= 4.00
+GL_ARB_gpu_shader_int64
+
+[vertex shader passthrough]
+
+[fragment shader]
+#version 400
+#extension GL_ARB_gpu_shader_int64 : require
+
+uniform int64_t ival[] = int64_t[](0xBADDC0DEDEADBEEFl,
+ 0xDEADBEA7BA5EBA11l,
+ 0xF0F1F2F3F4F5F6F7l,
+ 0x0F1F2F3F4F5F6F7Fl,
+ 0x7071727374757677l,
+ 0x0717273747576777l,
+ 0x1F2E3D4C5B6A7988l,
+ 0xBADB100DDEADC0DEl);
+
+const int64_t expected[] = int64_t[](0x00000000000000EFl,
+ 0x00000000000000BAl,
+ 0x00000000000000F5l,
+ 0x000000000000004Fl,
+ 0x0000000000000073l,
+ 0x0000000000000027l,
+ 0x000000000000002El,
+ 0x00000000000000BAl);
+
+out vec4 piglit_fragcolor;
+
+void main()
+{
+ uint fail_mask = 0;
+ uint64_t result;
+ uint i;
+
+ /* This is INTENTIONALLY not a loop. Putting it in a loop causes the
+ * optimization that generates the extract instructions to trigger
+ * before the shift count is known to be a constant. The effectively
+ * prevents the bad code generation in the i965 driver from occuring.
+ */
+ i = 0;
+ result = (ival[i] >> (i * 8u)) & 0x0FFl;
+ fail_mask |= result != expected[i] ? 1u << i : 0u;
+
+ i = 1;
+ result = (ival[i] >> (i * 8u)) & 0x0FFl;
+ fail_mask |= result != expected[i] ? 1u << i : 0u;
+
+ i = 2;
+ result = (ival[i] >> (i * 8u)) & 0x0FFl;
+ fail_mask |= result != expected[i] ? 1u << i : 0u;
+
+ i = 3;
+ result = (ival[i] >> (i * 8u)) & 0x0FFl;
+ fail_mask |= result != expected[i] ? 1u << i : 0u;
+
+ i = 4;
+ result = (ival[i] >> (i * 8u)) & 0x0FFl;
+ fail_mask |= result != expected[i] ? 1u << i : 0u;
+
+ i = 5;
+ result = (ival[i] >> (i * 8u)) & 0x0FFl;
+ fail_mask |= result != expected[i] ? 1u << i : 0u;
+
+ i = 6;
+ result = (ival[i] >> (i * 8u)) & 0x0FFl;
+ fail_mask |= result != expected[i] ? 1u << i : 0u;
+
+ i = 7;
+ result = (ival[i] >> (i * 8u)) & 0x0FFl;
+ fail_mask |= result != expected[i] ? 1u << i : 0u;
+
+ /* Construct a clever color so that just looking at the "Observed:"
+ * output from shader_runner will tell you exactly which values did
+ * not match.
+ */
+ piglit_fragcolor = fail_mask == 0
+ ? vec4(0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 1.0)
+ : vec4(float(fail_mask) / 255.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0);
+}
+
+[test]
+clear color 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
+clear
+
+draw rect -1 -1 2 2
+probe all rgba 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0
diff --git a/tests/spec/arb_gpu_shader_int64/execution/fs-ushr-and-mask-loop.shader_test b/tests/spec/arb_gpu_shader_int64/execution/fs-ushr-and-mask-loop.shader_test
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..e9d41cd70
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/spec/arb_gpu_shader_int64/execution/fs-ushr-and-mask-loop.shader_test
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+[require]
+GL >= 4.0
+GLSL >= 4.00
+GL_ARB_gpu_shader_int64
+
+[vertex shader passthrough]
+
+[fragment shader]
+#version 400
+#extension GL_ARB_gpu_shader_int64 : require
+
+uniform uint64_t ival[] = uint64_t[](0xBADDC0DEDEADBEEFul,
+ 0xDEADBEA7BA5EBA11ul,
+ 0xF0F1F2F3F4F5F6F7ul,
+ 0x0F1F2F3F4F5F6F7Ful,
+ 0x7071727374757677ul,
+ 0x0717273747576777ul,
+ 0x1F2E3D4C5B6A7988ul,
+ 0xBADB100DDEADC0DEul);
+
+const uint64_t expected[] = uint64_t[](0x00000000000000EFul,
+ 0x00000000000000BAul,
+ 0x00000000000000F5ul,
+ 0x000000000000004Ful,
+ 0x0000000000000073ul,
+ 0x0000000000000027ul,
+ 0x000000000000002Eul,
+ 0x00000000000000BAul);
+
+out vec4 piglit_fragcolor;
+
+void main()
+{
+ uint fail_mask = 0;
+ uint64_t result;
+
+ for (uint i = 0; i < uint(ival.length()); i++) {
+ result = (ival[i] >> (i * 8u)) & 0x0FFul;
+ fail_mask |= result != expected[i] ? 1u << i : 0u;
+ }
+
+ /* Construct a clever color so that just looking at the "Observed:"
+ * output from shader_runner will tell you exactly which values did
+ * not match.
+ */
+ piglit_fragcolor = fail_mask == 0
+ ? vec4(0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 1.0)
+ : vec4(float(fail_mask) / 255.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0);
+}
+
+[test]
+clear color 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
+clear
+
+draw rect -1 -1 2 2
+probe all rgba 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0
diff --git a/tests/spec/arb_gpu_shader_int64/execution/fs-ushr-and-mask.shader_test b/tests/spec/arb_gpu_shader_int64/execution/fs-ushr-and-mask.shader_test
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..96519624b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/spec/arb_gpu_shader_int64/execution/fs-ushr-and-mask.shader_test
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+[require]
+GL >= 4.0
+GLSL >= 4.00
+GL_ARB_gpu_shader_int64
+
+[vertex shader passthrough]
+
+[fragment shader]
+#version 400
+#extension GL_ARB_gpu_shader_int64 : require
+
+uniform uint64_t ival[] = uint64_t[](0xBADDC0DEDEADBEEFul,
+ 0xDEADBEA7BA5EBA11ul,
+ 0xF0F1F2F3F4F5F6F7ul,
+ 0x0F1F2F3F4F5F6F7Ful,
+ 0x7071727374757677ul,
+ 0x0717273747576777ul,
+ 0x1F2E3D4C5B6A7988ul,
+ 0xBADB100DDEADC0DEul);
+
+const uint64_t expected[] = uint64_t[](0x00000000000000EFul,
+ 0x00000000000000BAul,
+ 0x00000000000000F5ul,
+ 0x000000000000004Ful,
+ 0x0000000000000073ul,
+ 0x0000000000000027ul,
+ 0x000000000000002Eul,
+ 0x00000000000000BAul);
+
+out vec4 piglit_fragcolor;
+
+void main()
+{
+ uint fail_mask = 0;
+ uint64_t result;
+ uint i;
+
+ /* This is INTENTIONALLY not a loop. Putting it in a loop causes the
+ * optimization that generates the extract instructions to trigger
+ * before the shift count is known to be a constant. The effectively
+ * prevents the bad code generation in the i965 driver from occuring.
+ */
+ i = 0;
+ result = (ival[i] >> (i * 8u)) & 0x0FFul;
+ fail_mask |= result != expected[i] ? 1u << i : 0u;
+
+ i = 1;
+ result = (ival[i] >> (i * 8u)) & 0x0FFul;
+ fail_mask |= result != expected[i] ? 1u << i : 0u;
+
+ i = 2;
+ result = (ival[i] >> (i * 8u)) & 0x0FFul;
+ fail_mask |= result != expected[i] ? 1u << i : 0u;
+
+ i = 3;
+ result = (ival[i] >> (i * 8u)) & 0x0FFul;
+ fail_mask |= result != expected[i] ? 1u << i : 0u;
+
+ i = 4;
+ result = (ival[i] >> (i * 8u)) & 0x0FFul;
+ fail_mask |= result != expected[i] ? 1u << i : 0u;
+
+ i = 5;
+ result = (ival[i] >> (i * 8u)) & 0x0FFul;
+ fail_mask |= result != expected[i] ? 1u << i : 0u;
+
+ i = 6;
+ result = (ival[i] >> (i * 8u)) & 0x0FFul;
+ fail_mask |= result != expected[i] ? 1u << i : 0u;
+
+ i = 7;
+ result = (ival[i] >> (i * 8u)) & 0x0FFul;
+ fail_mask |= result != expected[i] ? 1u << i : 0u;
+
+ /* Construct a clever color so that just looking at the "Observed:"
+ * output from shader_runner will tell you exactly which values did
+ * not match.
+ */
+ piglit_fragcolor = fail_mask == 0
+ ? vec4(0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 1.0)
+ : vec4(float(fail_mask) / 255.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0);
+}
+
+[test]
+clear color 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
+clear
+
+draw rect -1 -1 2 2
+probe all rgba 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0
--
2.14.5
More information about the Piglit
mailing list