[Pixman] [PATCH 0/4] Reworked nearest-scaled-cover ARMv6 fast paths

Pekka Paalanen ppaalanen at gmail.com
Wed Aug 26 03:07:26 PDT 2015


On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 00:23:22 +0100
Ben Avison <bavison at riscosopen.org> wrote:

> As described in the individual patches, I'm actually suggesting we *don't*
> use this approach, since using general_composite_rect seems to increase the
> overhead so much that it's no longer just L1 tests that show regressions.
> However, I wanted to post these anyway:
> a) as a record of having tried and rejected this approach, and
> b) because the first patch may still be useful for the SSSE3 fetchers Søren
>    mentions, or Oded's VMX over_n_8888 case.
> 
> Ben Avison (4):
>   Expose general_composite_rect outside pixman-general.c
>   armv6: Add nearest-scaled-cover src_8888_8888 fast path
>   armv6: Add four more nearest-scaled-cover fast paths
>   armv6: Add nearest-scaled-cover src_0565_0565 fast path
> 
>  pixman/pixman-arm-common.h          |   18 +++++++++
>  pixman/pixman-arm-simd-asm-scaled.S |    4 ++
>  pixman/pixman-arm-simd-asm-scaled.h |   69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  pixman/pixman-arm-simd.c            |   55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  pixman/pixman-general.c             |    8 ++--
>  pixman/pixman-private.h             |    9 +++++
>  6 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 

Hi Ben,

ok, I'll mark these as Rejected in Patchwork.


Thanks,
pq
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pixman/attachments/20150826/59f8f8ab/attachment.sig>


More information about the Pixman mailing list