[Pixman] [PATCH 0/4] Reworked nearest-scaled-cover ARMv6 fast paths
Pekka Paalanen
ppaalanen at gmail.com
Wed Aug 26 03:07:26 PDT 2015
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 00:23:22 +0100
Ben Avison <bavison at riscosopen.org> wrote:
> As described in the individual patches, I'm actually suggesting we *don't*
> use this approach, since using general_composite_rect seems to increase the
> overhead so much that it's no longer just L1 tests that show regressions.
> However, I wanted to post these anyway:
> a) as a record of having tried and rejected this approach, and
> b) because the first patch may still be useful for the SSSE3 fetchers Søren
> mentions, or Oded's VMX over_n_8888 case.
>
> Ben Avison (4):
> Expose general_composite_rect outside pixman-general.c
> armv6: Add nearest-scaled-cover src_8888_8888 fast path
> armv6: Add four more nearest-scaled-cover fast paths
> armv6: Add nearest-scaled-cover src_0565_0565 fast path
>
> pixman/pixman-arm-common.h | 18 +++++++++
> pixman/pixman-arm-simd-asm-scaled.S | 4 ++
> pixman/pixman-arm-simd-asm-scaled.h | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> pixman/pixman-arm-simd.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> pixman/pixman-general.c | 8 ++--
> pixman/pixman-private.h | 9 +++++
> 6 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
Hi Ben,
ok, I'll mark these as Rejected in Patchwork.
Thanks,
pq
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pixman/attachments/20150826/59f8f8ab/attachment.sig>
More information about the Pixman
mailing list