[RFC] Use glib-2.0 exclusively

[Enrico Weigelt]

* Dan Nicholson <dbn.lists at gmail.com> schrieb:

> At the very least I wouldn't suggest anyone use the bundled 
> library unless they're in a bootstrapping situation.

Believe me, you certainly don't want to have anything like an
bootstrap situation at all, unless *REALLY* necessary.
(toolchain+libc should be the only case, else you *most likely*
have *very poor* engineering)

Keep in mind: anytime the depency graph is not an conflict-free
DAG, it makes *a lot* of trouble to package/distro maintainers.

Normally, I'm strictly against bundled 3rd-party libraries,
but that's one of the *very few* cases, where it makes quite
sense, BUT: the bundled stuff should be trimmed down to what's
absolutely necessary, and maybe even rename everything.


cu
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/

 phone:  +49 36207 519931  email: weigelt at metux.de
 mobile: +49 151 27565287  icq:   210169427         skype: nekrad666
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme
----------------------------------------------------------------------