[RFC] Use glib-2.0 exclusively
Daniel Macks
dmacks at netspace.org
Thu Aug 26 17:49:03 PDT 2010
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 20:36:33 -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 21:20 0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > ]] Enrico Weigelt
> >
> > | * Paul Bender <pebender at san.rr.com> schrieb:
> > |
> > | > However, I cannot see any reason that pkg-config could
> > | > not do the same thing with glib2 (and its dependencies: zlib).
> > |
> > | Is there any technical reason to move to glib2 ?
> > | What does it have that's _needed_ and the current in-tree glib1
> > | does not have ?
> >
> > A working option parser implementation, for instance. Less code to
> > maintain.
>
> GNU argp, for instance.
>
> It's Good Enough for a lot of things; and it's part of glibc.
You still need to provide an onboard source of it though. Is your
position that using argp is better than popt (currently used I think,
external lib or internal clone of its sources) and glib2 because it's a
better external codebase to import? glibc is only available on a subset
of pkg-config platforms.
dan
--
Daniel Macks
dmacks at netspace.org
More information about the pkg-config
mailing list