[RFC] Use glib-2.0 exclusively

Daniel Macks dmacks at netspace.org
Thu Aug 26 17:49:03 PDT 2010



On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 20:36:33 -0400, Braden McDaniel  wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 21:20  0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
  > > ]] Enrico Weigelt
  > >
  > > | * Paul Bender <pebender at san.rr.com> schrieb:
  > > |
  > > | > However, I cannot see any reason that pkg-config could
  > > | > not do the same thing with glib2 (and its dependencies: zlib). 
  > > |
  > > | Is there any technical reason to move to glib2 ?
  > > | What does it have that's _needed_ and the current in-tree glib1
  > > | does not have ?
  > >
  > > A working option parser implementation, for instance.  Less code to
  > > maintain. 
  >
  > GNU argp, for instance. 
  >
  > It's Good Enough for a lot of things; and it's part of glibc. 

You still need to provide an onboard source of it though. Is your 
position that using argp is better than popt (currently used I think, 
external lib or internal clone of its sources) and glib2 because it's a 
better external codebase to import? glibc is only available on a subset 
of pkg-config platforms. 
 
dan

  --
Daniel Macks
  dmacks at netspace.org

 
 



More information about the pkg-config mailing list