Upcoming 0.24

[Johannes Schmid]

Hi!

> Not your fault, but could you fix the indentation for this patch? There
> should be two spaces for the first indent to match the rest of the file.
> Also, could you squash the second patch in?
> 
> Seems good to me otherwise, though Tollef's question about whether
> --print-requires-private is still open. The other way would be to handle
> it with --static.

Sure, I will update it. But I would like to know if we want a
--print-requires-private or not first. Actually, for my use-case we are
only interested in --cflags-only-I of those packages anyway so the
private requires aren't of real interest but wouldn't harm.

Regards,
Johannes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pkg-config/attachments/20100509/cb6b640e/attachment-0001.pgp>